TSTP Solution File: CSR031+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR031+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 13 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query81,conjecture,
~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query81) ).
fof(ax1_1120,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( disjointwith(X13,X14)
=> disjointwith(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1120) ).
fof(ax1_289,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_289) ).
fof(ax1_296,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( disjointwith(X5,X6)
=> collection(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_296) ).
fof(ax1_447,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_447) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query81]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ disjointwith(X15,X16)
| disjointwith(X16,X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1120])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ collection(X2)
| ~ individual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_289])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ~ disjointwith(X7,X8)
| collection(X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_296])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( disjointwith(X1,X2)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_447]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptpcol_16_18488,c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ collection(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR031+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 00:34:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1090
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses : 42
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 42
% 0.28/1.46 # Processed clauses : 46
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # ...subsumed : 13
% 0.28/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 33
% 0.28/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 16
% 0.28/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Paramodulations : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.28/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 20
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 57
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9559
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 5192 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------