TSTP Solution File: CSR030+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR030+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.93s 28.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 14.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  16   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   3 sgn  13   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query180,conjecture,
    ? [X3] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
     => tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query180) ).

fof(ax3_11372,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11372) ).

fof(ax3_6493,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6493) ).

fof(ax3_10816,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
   => tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10816) ).

fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X22)
        & genlmt(X22,X23) )
     => mtvisible(X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).

fof(ax3_14388,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_14388) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X3] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
       => tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query180]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
      & ~ tptptypes_5_387(X4,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X4,X5)
      | tptptypes_5_387(X4,X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11372])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X4,X5)
      | tptptypes_6_388(X5,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6493])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_7_389(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
    | tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10816]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X24)
      | ~ genlmt(X24,X25)
      | mtvisible(X25) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_14388]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09  % Problem  : CSR030+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.09  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.08/0.29  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.29  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 20:56:23 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 14.93/28.15  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 14.93/28.15  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 14.93/28.15  # Preprocessing time       : 0.650 s
% 14.93/28.15  
% 14.93/28.15  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 14.93/28.15  # OLD status GaveUp
% 14.93/28.15  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 14.93/28.15  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44173
% 14.93/28.15  # Initial clauses                      : 45
% 14.93/28.15  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 45
% 14.93/28.15  # Processed clauses                    : 67
% 14.93/28.15  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 14.93/28.15  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 14.93/28.15  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 14.93/28.15  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Generated clauses                    : 30
% 14.93/28.15  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 22
% 14.93/28.15  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Paramodulations                      : 30
% 14.93/28.15  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of processed clauses  : 52
% 14.93/28.15  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 14.93/28.15  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 14.93/28.15  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 14.93/28.15  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 14.93/28.15  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117
% 14.93/28.15  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101
% 14.93/28.15  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 14.93/28.15  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 293641
% 14.93/28.15  
% 14.93/28.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.93/28.15  # User time                : 0.600 s
% 14.93/28.15  # System time              : 0.052 s
% 14.93/28.15  # Total time               : 0.652 s
% 14.93/28.15  # Maximum resident set size: 86668 pages
% 14.93/28.15  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 14.93/28.15  # Preprocessing time       : 1.972 s
% 14.93/28.15  
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof found!
% 14.93/28.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 14.93/28.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object total steps             : 23
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 14.93/28.15  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 14.93/28.15  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 14.93/28.15  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 14.93/28.15  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Initial clauses                      : 44218
% 14.93/28.15  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 14.93/28.15  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 44215
% 14.93/28.15  # Processed clauses                    : 44235
% 14.93/28.15  # ...of these trivial                  : 810
% 14.93/28.15  # ...subsumed                          : 800
% 14.93/28.15  # ...remaining for further processing  : 42624
% 14.93/28.15  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 14.93/28.15  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 179165
% 14.93/28.15  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 14.93/28.15  # Backward-rewritten                   : 764
% 14.93/28.15  # Generated clauses                    : 252612
% 14.93/28.15  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 233060
% 14.93/28.15  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 180
% 14.93/28.15  # Paramodulations                      : 252610
% 14.93/28.15  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of processed clauses  : 41857
% 14.93/28.15  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 22864
% 14.93/28.15  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 14.93/28.15  #    Negative unit clauses             : 111
% 14.93/28.15  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18882
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53360
% 14.93/28.15  # ...number of literals in the above   : 83993
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Current number of archived clauses   : 765
% 14.93/28.15  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36783513
% 14.93/28.15  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33378259
% 14.93/28.15  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 979
% 14.93/28.15  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1191968
% 14.93/28.15  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1638306
% 14.93/28.15  # BW rewrite match successes           : 151
% 14.93/28.15  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 14.93/28.15  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3809719
% 14.93/28.15  
% 14.93/28.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 14.93/28.15  # User time                : 12.089 s
% 14.93/28.15  # System time              : 0.287 s
% 14.93/28.15  # Total time               : 12.376 s
% 14.93/28.15  # Maximum resident set size: 340244 pages
% 14.93/38.11  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 14.93/38.13  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.13  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.14  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.14  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.15  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.15  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.16  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.16  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.17  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.17  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.18  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.18  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/38.19  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 14.93/38.19  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 14.93/40.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.10  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.10  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.11  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.11  eprover: No such file or directory
% 14.93/40.12  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 14.93/40.12  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------