TSTP Solution File: CSR030+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR030+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.25s 2.43s
% Output   : Refutation 2.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CSR030+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 09:34:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.25/2.43  
% 2.25/2.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.25/2.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.25/2.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.25/2.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.25/2.43  SPASS derived 3631 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3673 clauses.
% 2.25/2.43  SPASS allocated 101114 KBytes.
% 2.25/2.43  SPASS spent	0:00:02.01 on the problem.
% 2.25/2.43  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 2.25/2.43  		0:00:00.18 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.25/2.43  		0:00:00.12 for inferences.
% 2.25/2.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.25/2.43  		0:00:01.32 for the reduction.
% 2.25/2.43  
% 2.25/2.43  
% 2.25/2.43  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 15 :
% 2.25/2.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.25/2.43  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)*.
% 2.25/2.43  85[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*l.
% 2.25/2.43  268[0:Inp] || tptptypes_5_387(u,c_pushingwithopenhand)* -> .
% 2.25/2.43  485[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) -> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)*.
% 2.25/2.43  997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 2.25/2.43  1005[0:Inp] || tptptypes_6_388(u,v)* -> tptptypes_5_387(u,v).
% 2.25/2.43  1017[0:Inp] || tptptypes_7_389(u,v) -> tptptypes_6_388(v,u)*.
% 2.25/2.43  1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 2.25/2.43  1135[0:Res:1005.1,268.0] || tptptypes_6_388(u,c_pushingwithopenhand)* -> .
% 2.25/2.43  2713[0:Res:1017.1,1135.0] || tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,u)* -> .
% 2.25/2.43  2717[0:MRR:485.1,2713.0] || mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)* -> .
% 2.25/2.43  4157[0:Res:85.0,997.0] ||  -> microtheory(c_tptp_member3393_mt)*.
% 2.25/2.43  5116[0:Res:85.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.25/2.43  5267[0:SSi:5116.0,1.0,4157.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.25/2.43  5268[0:MRR:5267.0,2717.0] ||  -> .
% 2.25/2.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.25/2.43  Formulae used in the proof : query80 ax1_133 ax1_451 ax1_1127 ax1_99 ax1_302 ax1_1123
% 2.25/2.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------