TSTP Solution File: CSR029+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR029+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.07s 14.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query179,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query179) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_7771,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_7771) ).
fof(ax3_11398,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11398) ).
fof(ax3_1891,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1891) ).
fof(ax3_18015,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
=> inregion(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_18015) ).
fof(ax3_11699,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11699) ).
fof(ax3_43403,axiom,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( ( inregion(X16,X17)
& inregion(X17,X18) )
=> inregion(X16,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43403) ).
fof(ax3_4349,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4349) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query179]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( ~ mtvisible(X24)
| ~ genlmt(X24,X25)
| mtvisible(X25) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
& ( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_7771]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11398]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_1891]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X4,X5)
| inregion(X5,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_18015])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11699]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21] :
( ~ inregion(X19,X20)
| ~ inregion(X20,X21)
| inregion(X19,X21) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43403])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4349]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( inregion(X1,X2)
| ~ inregion(X3,X2)
| ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR029+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:10:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 13.07/14.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 13.07/14.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 13.07/14.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.792 s
% 13.07/14.26
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof found!
% 13.07/14.26 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.07/14.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object total steps : 36
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 13.07/14.26 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 12
% 13.07/14.26 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.07/14.26 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 13.07/14.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44116
% 13.07/14.26 # Initial clauses : 102
% 13.07/14.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 102
% 13.07/14.26 # Processed clauses : 144
% 13.07/14.26 # ...of these trivial : 15
% 13.07/14.26 # ...subsumed : 12
% 13.07/14.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 117
% 13.07/14.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 13.07/14.26 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 13.07/14.26 # Generated clauses : 114
% 13.07/14.26 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 88
% 13.07/14.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Paramodulations : 114
% 13.07/14.26 # Factorizations : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 113
% 13.07/14.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 55
% 13.07/14.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 13.07/14.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 47
% 13.07/14.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 13.07/14.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 80
% 13.07/14.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 13.07/14.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 644
% 13.07/14.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 634
% 13.07/14.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 13.07/14.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 405
% 13.07/14.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 13.07/14.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 13.07/14.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 13.07/14.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 295861
% 13.07/14.26
% 13.07/14.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.07/14.26 # User time : 0.743 s
% 13.07/14.26 # System time : 0.054 s
% 13.07/14.26 # Total time : 0.797 s
% 13.07/14.26 # Maximum resident set size: 86724 pages
% 13.07/14.85 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.85 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.86 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.86 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.86 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.86 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.87 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.87 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.87 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.87 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.88 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.88 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.88 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.88 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/14.89 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.26 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 13.07/36.29 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.29 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.29 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.29 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.30 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.30 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.31 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.31 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.32 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.32 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 13.07/36.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 13.07/36.34 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------