TSTP Solution File: CSR028+5 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : CSR028+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:05:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.82s 9.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query228,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
=> individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query228) ).
fof(ax4_195384,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_195384) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
=> individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query228]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
& ~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_195384]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09 % Problem : CSR028+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.09/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 06:26:53 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 8.82/9.02 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 8.82/9.02 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 8.82/9.02 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.82/9.02 #
% 8.82/9.02 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.82/9.02
% 8.82/9.02 # Proof found!
% 8.82/9.02 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.82/9.02 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.82/9.02 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------