TSTP Solution File: CSR027+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.47s 3.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2446,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_2446) ).
cnf(i_0_318,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2610_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_318) ).
cnf(i_0_2560,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_2560) ).
cnf(i_0_2559,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_31868(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_2559) ).
cnf(i_0_2115,plain,
( tptpcol_16_31868(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_2115) ).
cnf(i_0_260,plain,
( tptp_8_875(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(i_0_154,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_154) ).
cnf(i_0_261,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_261) ).
cnf(i_0_772,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57xl5qu5/input.p',i_0_772) ).
cnf(c_0_2570,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2446 ).
cnf(c_0_2571,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2610_mt),
i_0_318 ).
cnf(c_0_2572,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_2560 ).
cnf(c_0_2573,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_31868(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X1) ),
i_0_2559 ).
cnf(c_0_2574,plain,
( tptpcol_16_31868(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
i_0_2115 ).
cnf(c_0_2575,plain,
( tptp_8_875(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)) ),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_2576,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2570,c_0_2571]),c_0_2572])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2577,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2573,c_0_2574]) ).
cnf(c_0_2578,plain,
( tptp_8_875(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868))
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2575,c_0_2576])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2579,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)),
i_0_154 ).
cnf(c_0_2580,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt) ),
i_0_261 ).
cnf(c_0_2581,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868),c_tptpcol_16_31868),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2577,c_0_2578]),c_0_2579])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2582,plain,
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationallexists(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_772 ).
cnf(c_0_2583,plain,
relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2580,c_0_2576])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2584,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2581,c_0_2582]),c_0_2579]),c_0_2583])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR027+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:02:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.47/3.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 10.47/3.42 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 10.47/3.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.055 s
% 10.47/3.42
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof found!
% 10.47/3.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.47/3.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object total steps : 24
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 10.47/3.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 11
% 10.47/3.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.47/3.42 # Parsed axioms : 2560
% 10.47/3.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Initial clauses : 2560
% 10.47/3.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2560
% 10.47/3.42 # Processed clauses : 3209
% 10.47/3.42 # ...of these trivial : 272
% 10.47/3.42 # ...subsumed : 206
% 10.47/3.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 2731
% 10.47/3.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 10.47/3.42 # Backward-rewritten : 68
% 10.47/3.42 # Generated clauses : 6603
% 10.47/3.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6297
% 10.47/3.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12
% 10.47/3.42 # Paramodulations : 6603
% 10.47/3.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2662
% 10.47/3.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1145
% 10.47/3.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Negative unit clauses : 257
% 10.47/3.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 1260
% 10.47/3.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5493
% 10.47/3.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 9410
% 10.47/3.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 69
% 10.47/3.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 292001
% 10.47/3.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 265657
% 10.47/3.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 218
% 10.47/3.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 122312
% 10.47/3.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 104
% 10.47/3.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 10.47/3.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 10.47/3.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 86122
% 10.47/3.42
% 10.47/3.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.47/3.42 # User time : 0.235 s
% 10.47/3.42 # System time : 0.023 s
% 10.47/3.42 # Total time : 0.258 s
% 10.47/3.42 # ...preprocessing : 0.055 s
% 10.47/3.42 # ...main loop : 0.204 s
% 10.47/3.42 # Maximum resident set size: 23656 pages
% 10.47/3.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------