TSTP Solution File: CSR004+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR004+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 25 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 53 ( 19 ~; 23 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(happens_all_defn,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( happens(X4,X5)
<=> ( ( X4 = tapOn
& X5 = n0 )
| ( holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X5)
& holdsAt(filling,X5)
& X4 = overflow ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIVy4hpAC0/E---3.1_16646.p',happens_all_defn) ).
fof(overflow_3,conjecture,
happens(overflow,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIVy4hpAC0/E---3.1_16646.p',overflow_3) ).
fof(filling_3,lemma,
holdsAt(filling,n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIVy4hpAC0/E---3.1_16646.p',filling_3) ).
fof(waterLevel_3,lemma,
holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),n3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIVy4hpAC0/E---3.1_16646.p',waterLevel_3) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ( holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43)
| X42 = tapOn
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( holdsAt(filling,X43)
| X42 = tapOn
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( X42 = overflow
| X42 = tapOn
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43)
| X43 = n0
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( holdsAt(filling,X43)
| X43 = n0
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( X42 = overflow
| X43 = n0
| ~ happens(X42,X43) )
& ( X42 != tapOn
| X43 != n0
| happens(X42,X43) )
& ( ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X43)
| ~ holdsAt(filling,X43)
| X42 != overflow
| happens(X42,X43) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[happens_all_defn])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[overflow_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( happens(X2,X1)
| ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X1)
| ~ holdsAt(filling,X1)
| X2 != overflow ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( happens(overflow,X1)
| ~ holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),X1)
| ~ holdsAt(filling,X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
holdsAt(filling,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[filling_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
holdsAt(waterLevel(n3),n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[waterLevel_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ happens(overflow,n3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR004+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:08:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIVy4hpAC0/E---3.1_16646.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 16724 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 16728 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 18
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 104
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 103
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 156
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 20
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 136
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 17
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 18
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 155
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 84
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 455
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5135
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 1059
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 2056 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------