TSTP Solution File: COM135+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : COM135+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:44:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 15.32s 3.01s
% Output   : Proof 19.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COM135+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 13:05:00 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.66  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.66  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.66  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.66  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.66  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.66  
% 0.21/0.66  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.66  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.66  
% 0.21/0.66  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.66  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.66                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.66  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.66  
% 0.21/0.66  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.66  
% 0.21/0.66  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.69  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.71  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.85/1.51  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.51  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.55  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.55  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.55  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.55  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.85/1.55  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 11.68/2.44  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 11.68/2.44  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.68/2.45  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.68/2.46  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.96/2.49  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 12.75/2.62  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 14.82/2.88  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 15.32/3.01  Prover 3: proved (2310ms)
% 15.32/3.01  
% 15.32/3.01  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.32/3.01  
% 15.32/3.01  Prover 6: stopped
% 15.32/3.02  Prover 0: stopped
% 15.99/3.02  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 15.99/3.02  Prover 2: stopped
% 15.99/3.03  Prover 5: stopped
% 15.99/3.03  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 15.99/3.03  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 15.99/3.03  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 15.99/3.03  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 16.46/3.16  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 17.06/3.16  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 17.15/3.18  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 17.15/3.20  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 17.44/3.21  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 18.27/3.36  Prover 1: Found proof (size 79)
% 18.27/3.36  Prover 1: proved (2671ms)
% 18.27/3.37  Prover 10: stopped
% 18.27/3.37  Prover 4: stopped
% 18.27/3.37  Prover 7: stopped
% 18.27/3.39  Prover 11: stopped
% 18.27/3.39  Prover 13: stopped
% 18.27/3.44  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 18.27/3.45  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.27/3.46  Prover 8: stopped
% 18.27/3.46  
% 18.27/3.46  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.27/3.46  
% 18.27/3.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 18.27/3.48  Assumptions after simplification:
% 18.27/3.48  ---------------------------------
% 18.27/3.48  
% 18.27/3.48    (DIFF-var-abs)
% 18.27/3.50     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 18.27/3.50      (vabs(v1, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 18.27/3.50      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.50  
% 18.27/3.50    (DIFF-var-app)
% 18.27/3.50     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (vapp(v1, v2) =
% 18.27/3.50        v3) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.50  
% 18.27/3.50    (EQ-someType)
% 18.27/3.50     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vsomeType(v1) = v2) |
% 18.27/3.50       ~ (vsomeType(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.50  
% 18.27/3.50    (EQ-var)
% 18.27/3.50     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vvar(v1) = v2) |  ~
% 18.27/3.50      (vvar(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.50  
% 18.27/3.50    (T-Strong)
% 18.27/3.51     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 18.27/3.51      $i] : ( ~ (vtcheck(v5, v3, v4) = 0) |  ~ (vbind(v0, v1, v2) = v5) |  ~
% 18.27/3.51      $i(v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ?
% 18.27/3.51      [v7: any] : (vtcheck(v2, v3, v4) = v7 & visFreeVar(v0, v3) = v6 & (v7 = 0 |
% 18.27/3.51          v6 = 0)))
% 18.27/3.51  
% 18.27/3.51    (T-inv)
% 18.27/3.51     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (vtcheck(v2, v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 18.27/3.51      $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : 
% 18.27/3.51      ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] : (varrow(v5, v6) = v1 & vtcheck(v7, v4, v6) = 0 &
% 18.27/3.51        vbind(v3, v5, v2) = v7 & vabs(v3, v5, v4) = v0 & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5)
% 18.27/3.51        & $i(v4) & $i(v3)) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i]
% 18.27/3.51      : (varrow(v5, v1) = v6 & vtcheck(v2, v4, v5) = 0 & vtcheck(v2, v3, v6) = 0 &
% 18.27/3.51        vapp(v3, v4) = v0 & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3)) |  ? [v3: $i] :
% 18.27/3.51      (vsomeType(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ? [v4: $i] : (vlookup(v4, v2) = v3 &
% 18.27/3.51          vvar(v4) = v0 & $i(v4))))
% 18.27/3.51  
% 18.27/3.51    (T-subst-var)
% 18.27/3.51     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 18.27/3.51      $i] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: int] : ( ~ (v9 = 0)
% 18.27/3.51      & vsubst(v2, v3, v7) = v8 & vtcheck(v6, v7, v5) = 0 & vtcheck(v1, v8, v5) =
% 18.27/3.51      v9 & vtcheck(v1, v3, v0) = 0 & vbind(v2, v0, v1) = v6 & vvar(v4) = v7 &
% 18.27/3.51      $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 18.27/3.51      $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.51  
% 18.27/3.51    (isFreeVar0)
% 18.27/3.51     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (visFreeVar(v0,
% 18.27/3.51          v1) = v3) |  ~ (vvar(v2) = v1) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | ((
% 18.27/3.52          ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = v0) & ( ~ (v2 = v0) | v3 = 0)))
% 18.27/3.52  
% 18.27/3.52    (lookup1)
% 18.27/3.52     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 18.27/3.52      (vlookup(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (vbind(v1, v4, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v4) |  ~ $i(v3)
% 18.27/3.52      |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | vsomeType(v4) = v3)
% 18.27/3.52  
% 18.27/3.52    (subst0)
% 18.27/3.52     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~
% 18.27/3.52      (vsubst(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 18.27/3.52      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.52  
% 18.27/3.52    (subst1)
% 18.27/3.52     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v4 = v1
% 18.27/3.52      | v3 = v2 |  ~ (vsubst(v1, v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (vvar(v4) = v2) |  ~ $i(v4) | 
% 18.27/3.52      ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 18.27/3.52  
% 18.27/3.52    (function-axioms)
% 18.27/3.53     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 18.27/3.53      |  ~ (vsubst(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vsubst(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 18.27/3.53      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 18.27/3.53    :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vtcheck(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vtcheck(v4, v3,
% 18.27/3.53          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  !
% 18.27/3.53    [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vbind(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vbind(v4, v3, v2) =
% 18.27/3.53        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i]
% 18.27/3.53    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vabs(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (vabs(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 18.27/3.53    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (varrow(v3,
% 18.27/3.53          v2) = v1) |  ~ (varrow(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 18.27/3.53    [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vlookup(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (vlookup(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 18.27/3.53      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (visFreeVar(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (visFreeVar(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 18.27/3.53    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vapp(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (vapp(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 18.27/3.53      ~ (vreduce(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vreduce(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 18.27/3.53    ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vgetSomeExp(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vgetSomeExp(v2) = v0))
% 18.27/3.53    &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1
% 18.27/3.53      = v0 |  ~ (visSomeExp(v2) = v1) |  ~ (visSomeExp(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 18.27/3.53    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vsomeExp(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (vsomeExp(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 18.27/3.53      ~ (vgensym(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vgensym(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 18.27/3.53    ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vgetSomeType(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vgetSomeType(v2) =
% 18.27/3.53        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 18.27/3.53      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (visSomeType(v2) = v1) |  ~ (visSomeType(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 18.27/3.53    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vsomeType(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (vsomeType(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 18.27/3.53      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (visValue(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 18.27/3.53      (visValue(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 18.27/3.53      ~ (vvar(v2) = v1) |  ~ (vvar(v2) = v0))
% 18.27/3.53  
% 18.27/3.53  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 18.27/3.53  --------------------------------------------
% 18.27/3.53  DIFF-abs-app, DIFF-empty-bind, DIFF-noExp-someExp, DIFF-noType-someType, EQ-abs,
% 18.27/3.53  EQ-app, EQ-arrow, EQ-bind, EQ-empty, EQ-noExp, EQ-noType, EQ-someExp,
% 18.27/3.53  T-Context-Duplicate, T-Context-Swap, T-Weak, T-Weak-FreeVar, T-abs, T-app,
% 18.27/3.53  T-var, gensym-is-fresh, getSomeExp0, getSomeType0, isFreeVar1, isFreeVar2,
% 18.27/3.53  isSomeExp0, isSomeExp1, isSomeType0, isSomeType1, isValue0, isValue1, isValue2,
% 18.27/3.53  lookup-INV, lookup0, lookup2, reduce-INV, reduce0, reduce1, reduce2, reduce3,
% 18.27/3.53  reduce4, reduce5, reduce6, subst-INV, subst2, subst3, subst4, subst5
% 18.27/3.53  
% 18.27/3.53  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 18.27/3.53  ---------------------------------
% 18.27/3.53  
% 18.27/3.53  Begin of proof
% 18.27/3.53  | 
% 18.27/3.53  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 19.11/3.53  |   (1)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.11/3.53  |         ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vtcheck(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | 
% 19.11/3.53  |          ~ (vtcheck(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.11/3.53  | 
% 19.11/3.53  | DELTA: instantiating (T-subst-var) with fresh symbols all_56_0, all_56_1,
% 19.11/3.53  |        all_56_2, all_56_3, all_56_4, all_56_5, all_56_6, all_56_7, all_56_8,
% 19.11/3.53  |        all_56_9 gives:
% 19.11/3.53  |   (2)   ~ (all_56_0 = 0) & vsubst(all_56_7, all_56_6, all_56_2) = all_56_1 &
% 19.11/3.53  |        vtcheck(all_56_3, all_56_2, all_56_4) = 0 & vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_1,
% 19.11/3.53  |          all_56_4) = all_56_0 & vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_6, all_56_9) = 0 &
% 19.11/3.53  |        vbind(all_56_7, all_56_9, all_56_8) = all_56_3 & vvar(all_56_5) =
% 19.11/3.53  |        all_56_2 & $i(all_56_1) & $i(all_56_2) & $i(all_56_3) & $i(all_56_4) &
% 19.11/3.53  |        $i(all_56_5) & $i(all_56_6) & $i(all_56_7) & $i(all_56_8) &
% 19.11/3.53  |        $i(all_56_9)
% 19.11/3.53  | 
% 19.11/3.53  | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 19.11/3.53  |   (3)   ~ (all_56_0 = 0)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (4)  $i(all_56_9)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (5)  $i(all_56_8)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (6)  $i(all_56_7)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (7)  $i(all_56_6)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (8)  $i(all_56_5)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (9)  $i(all_56_4)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (10)  $i(all_56_3)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (11)  $i(all_56_2)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (12)  $i(all_56_1)
% 19.11/3.53  |   (13)  vvar(all_56_5) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.53  |   (14)  vbind(all_56_7, all_56_9, all_56_8) = all_56_3
% 19.11/3.53  |   (15)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_6, all_56_9) = 0
% 19.11/3.53  |   (16)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_1, all_56_4) = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.53  |   (17)  vtcheck(all_56_3, all_56_2, all_56_4) = 0
% 19.11/3.53  |   (18)  vsubst(all_56_7, all_56_6, all_56_2) = all_56_1
% 19.11/3.53  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (T-Strong) with all_56_7, all_56_9, all_56_8,
% 19.11/3.54  |              all_56_2, all_56_4, all_56_3, simplifying with (4), (5), (6),
% 19.11/3.54  |              (9), (11), (14), (17) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (19)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_2, all_56_4) =
% 19.11/3.54  |           v1 & visFreeVar(all_56_7, all_56_2) = v0 & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (T-inv) with all_56_2, all_56_4, all_56_3,
% 19.11/3.54  |              simplifying with (9), (10), (11), (17) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (20)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 19.11/3.54  |         (varrow(v2, v3) = all_56_4 & vtcheck(v4, v1, v3) = 0 & vbind(v0, v2,
% 19.11/3.54  |             all_56_3) = v4 & vabs(v0, v2, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 19.11/3.54  |           $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i]
% 19.11/3.54  |         :  ? [v3: $i] : (varrow(v2, all_56_4) = v3 & vtcheck(all_56_3, v1, v2)
% 19.11/3.54  |           = 0 & vtcheck(all_56_3, v0, v3) = 0 & vapp(v0, v1) = all_56_2 &
% 19.11/3.54  |           $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) |  ? [v0: $i] :
% 19.11/3.54  |         (vsomeType(all_56_4) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ? [v1: $i] : (vlookup(v1,
% 19.11/3.54  |               all_56_3) = v0 & vvar(v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v1)))
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (subst1) with all_56_6, all_56_7, all_56_2,
% 19.11/3.54  |              all_56_1, all_56_5, simplifying with (6), (7), (8), (11), (12),
% 19.11/3.54  |              (13), (18) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (21)  all_56_1 = all_56_2 | all_56_5 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1 gives:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (22)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_2, all_56_4) = all_63_0 &
% 19.11/3.54  |         visFreeVar(all_56_7, all_56_2) = all_63_1 & (all_63_0 = 0 | all_63_1 =
% 19.11/3.54  |           0)
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (23)  visFreeVar(all_56_7, all_56_2) = all_63_1
% 19.11/3.54  |   (24)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_2, all_56_4) = all_63_0
% 19.11/3.54  |   (25)  all_63_0 = 0 | all_63_1 = 0
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (isFreeVar0) with all_56_7, all_56_2, all_56_5,
% 19.11/3.54  |              all_63_1, simplifying with (6), (8), (11), (13), (23) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (26)  ( ~ (all_63_1 = 0) | all_56_5 = all_56_7) & ( ~ (all_56_5 = all_56_7)
% 19.11/3.54  |           | all_63_1 = 0)
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 19.11/3.54  |   (27)   ~ (all_63_1 = 0) | all_56_5 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | BETA: splitting (21) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  | 
% 19.11/3.54  | Case 1:
% 19.11/3.54  | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | |   (28)  all_56_1 = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.54  | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | REDUCE: (16), (28) imply:
% 19.11/3.54  | |   (29)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_2, all_56_4) = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.54  | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_63_0, all_56_0, all_56_4, all_56_2,
% 19.11/3.54  | |              all_56_8, simplifying with (24), (29) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  | |   (30)  all_63_0 = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.54  | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | BETA: splitting (25) gives:
% 19.11/3.54  | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | Case 1:
% 19.11/3.54  | | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | |   (31)  all_63_0 = 0
% 19.11/3.54  | | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | | COMBINE_EQS: (30), (31) imply:
% 19.11/3.54  | | |   (32)  all_56_0 = 0
% 19.11/3.54  | | | 
% 19.11/3.54  | | | REDUCE: (3), (32) imply:
% 19.11/3.54  | | |   (33)  $false
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | CLOSE: (33) is inconsistent.
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | Case 2:
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | |   (34)  all_63_1 = 0
% 19.11/3.55  | | |   (35)   ~ (all_63_0 = 0)
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | BETA: splitting (27) gives:
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | Case 1:
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |   (36)   ~ (all_63_1 = 0)
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | REDUCE: (34), (36) imply:
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |   (37)  $false
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | CLOSE: (37) is inconsistent.
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | Case 2:
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |   (38)  all_56_5 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | REF_CLOSE: (1), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13),
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |            (14), (15), (16), (18), (20), (38), (DIFF-var-abs),
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |            (DIFF-var-app), (EQ-someType), (EQ-var), (lookup1), (subst0)
% 19.11/3.55  | | | |            are inconsistent by sub-proof #1.
% 19.11/3.55  | | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | | End of split
% 19.11/3.55  | | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | End of split
% 19.11/3.55  | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | Case 2:
% 19.11/3.55  | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | |   (39)  all_56_5 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.55  | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | | REF_CLOSE: (1), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14),
% 19.11/3.55  | |            (15), (16), (18), (20), (39), (DIFF-var-abs), (DIFF-var-app),
% 19.11/3.55  | |            (EQ-someType), (EQ-var), (lookup1), (subst0) are inconsistent by
% 19.11/3.55  | |            sub-proof #1.
% 19.11/3.55  | | 
% 19.11/3.55  | End of split
% 19.11/3.55  | 
% 19.11/3.55  End of proof
% 19.11/3.55  
% 19.11/3.55  Sub-proof #1 shows that the following formulas are inconsistent:
% 19.11/3.55  ----------------------------------------------------------------
% 19.11/3.55    (1)  $i(all_56_6)
% 19.11/3.56    (2)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 19.11/3.56         (varrow(v2, v3) = all_56_4 & vtcheck(v4, v1, v3) = 0 & vbind(v0, v2,
% 19.11/3.56             all_56_3) = v4 & vabs(v0, v2, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 19.11/3.56           $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : 
% 19.11/3.56         ? [v3: $i] : (varrow(v2, all_56_4) = v3 & vtcheck(all_56_3, v1, v2) = 0 &
% 19.11/3.56           vtcheck(all_56_3, v0, v3) = 0 & vapp(v0, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v3) &
% 19.11/3.56           $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) |  ? [v0: $i] : (vsomeType(all_56_4) = v0 &
% 19.11/3.56           $i(v0) &  ? [v1: $i] : (vlookup(v1, all_56_3) = v0 & vvar(v1) =
% 19.11/3.56             all_56_2 & $i(v1)))
% 19.11/3.56    (3)  all_56_5 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.56    (4)  vbind(all_56_7, all_56_9, all_56_8) = all_56_3
% 19.11/3.56    (5)  $i(all_56_8)
% 19.11/3.56    (6)  $i(all_56_3)
% 19.11/3.56    (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~
% 19.11/3.56           (vsubst(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2)
% 19.11/3.56           |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (8)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_1, all_56_4) = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.56    (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (vapp(v1, v2)
% 19.11/3.56             = v3) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (10)  $i(all_56_4)
% 19.11/3.56    (11)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vsomeType(v1) =
% 19.11/3.56              v2) |  ~ (vsomeType(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (12)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : 
% 19.11/3.56          ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vtcheck(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 19.11/3.56            (vtcheck(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (13)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_6, all_56_9) = 0
% 19.11/3.56    (14)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (vvar(v1) = v2)
% 19.11/3.56            |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (15)  $i(all_56_5)
% 19.11/3.56    (16)  vvar(all_56_5) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.56    (17)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 19.11/3.56            ~ (vabs(v1, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (vvar(v0) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2)
% 19.11/3.56            |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.56    (18)  $i(all_56_1)
% 19.11/3.56    (19)   ~ (all_56_0 = 0)
% 19.11/3.56    (20)  $i(all_56_2)
% 19.11/3.56    (21)  $i(all_56_9)
% 19.11/3.56    (22)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (
% 19.11/3.56            ~ (vlookup(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (vbind(v1, v4, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v4) | 
% 19.11/3.56            ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | vsomeType(v4) = v3)
% 19.11/3.56    (23)  vsubst(all_56_7, all_56_6, all_56_2) = all_56_1
% 19.11/3.56  
% 19.11/3.56  Begin of proof
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | REDUCE: (3), (16) imply:
% 19.11/3.56  |   (24)  vvar(all_56_7) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | REDUCE: (3), (15) imply:
% 19.11/3.56  |   (25)  $i(all_56_7)
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_56_7, all_56_6, all_56_2, all_56_1,
% 19.11/3.56  |              simplifying with (1), (18), (20), (23), (24), (25) gives:
% 19.11/3.56  |   (26)  all_56_1 = all_56_6
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | REDUCE: (8), (26) imply:
% 19.11/3.56  |   (27)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_6, all_56_4) = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | BETA: splitting (2) gives:
% 19.11/3.56  | 
% 19.11/3.56  | Case 1:
% 19.11/3.56  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (28)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i]
% 19.11/3.57  | |         : (varrow(v2, v3) = all_56_4 & vtcheck(v4, v1, v3) = 0 & vbind(v0,
% 19.11/3.57  | |             v2, all_56_3) = v4 & vabs(v0, v2, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v4) &
% 19.11/3.57  | |           $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | DELTA: instantiating (28) with fresh symbols all_98_0, all_98_1, all_98_2,
% 19.11/3.57  | |        all_98_3, all_98_4 gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (29)  varrow(all_98_2, all_98_1) = all_56_4 & vtcheck(all_98_0, all_98_3,
% 19.11/3.57  | |           all_98_1) = 0 & vbind(all_98_4, all_98_2, all_56_3) = all_98_0 &
% 19.11/3.57  | |         vabs(all_98_4, all_98_2, all_98_3) = all_56_2 & $i(all_98_0) &
% 19.11/3.57  | |         $i(all_98_1) & $i(all_98_2) & $i(all_98_3) & $i(all_98_4)
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (30)  $i(all_98_4)
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (31)  $i(all_98_3)
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (32)  $i(all_98_2)
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (33)  vabs(all_98_4, all_98_2, all_98_3) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (17) with all_56_7, all_98_4, all_98_2, all_98_3,
% 19.11/3.57  | |              all_56_2, simplifying with (24), (25), (30), (31), (32), (33)
% 19.11/3.57  | |              gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (34)  $false
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent.
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | Case 2:
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | |   (35)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (varrow(v2,
% 19.11/3.57  | |             all_56_4) = v3 & vtcheck(all_56_3, v1, v2) = 0 &
% 19.11/3.57  | |           vtcheck(all_56_3, v0, v3) = 0 & vapp(v0, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v3) &
% 19.11/3.57  | |           $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) |  ? [v0: $i] : (vsomeType(all_56_4) =
% 19.11/3.57  | |           v0 & $i(v0) &  ? [v1: $i] : (vlookup(v1, all_56_3) = v0 & vvar(v1)
% 19.11/3.57  | |             = all_56_2 & $i(v1)))
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | BETA: splitting (35) gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | Case 1:
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (36)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 19.11/3.57  | | |         (varrow(v2, all_56_4) = v3 & vtcheck(all_56_3, v1, v2) = 0 &
% 19.11/3.57  | | |           vtcheck(all_56_3, v0, v3) = 0 & vapp(v0, v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v3)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |           & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_98_0, all_98_1, all_98_2,
% 19.11/3.57  | | |        all_98_3 gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (37)  varrow(all_98_1, all_56_4) = all_98_0 & vtcheck(all_56_3,
% 19.11/3.57  | | |           all_98_2, all_98_1) = 0 & vtcheck(all_56_3, all_98_3, all_98_0)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |         = 0 & vapp(all_98_3, all_98_2) = all_56_2 & $i(all_98_0) &
% 19.11/3.57  | | |         $i(all_98_1) & $i(all_98_2) & $i(all_98_3)
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (38)  $i(all_98_3)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (39)  $i(all_98_2)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (40)  vapp(all_98_3, all_98_2) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_56_7, all_98_3, all_98_2,
% 19.11/3.57  | | |              all_56_2, simplifying with (24), (25), (38), (39), (40)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |              gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (41)  $false
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent.
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | Case 2:
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (42)   ? [v0: $i] : (vsomeType(all_56_4) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ? [v1: $i] :
% 19.11/3.57  | | |           (vlookup(v1, all_56_3) = v0 & vvar(v1) = all_56_2 & $i(v1)))
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | DELTA: instantiating (42) with fresh symbol all_98_0 gives:
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (43)  vsomeType(all_56_4) = all_98_0 & $i(all_98_0) &  ? [v0: $i] :
% 19.11/3.57  | | |         (vlookup(v0, all_56_3) = all_98_0 & vvar(v0) = all_56_2 & $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | ALPHA: (43) implies:
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (44)  $i(all_98_0)
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (45)  vsomeType(all_56_4) = all_98_0
% 19.11/3.57  | | |   (46)   ? [v0: $i] : (vlookup(v0, all_56_3) = all_98_0 & vvar(v0) =
% 19.11/3.57  | | |           all_56_2 & $i(v0))
% 19.11/3.57  | | | 
% 19.11/3.57  | | | DELTA: instantiating (46) with fresh symbol all_100_0 gives:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (47)  vlookup(all_100_0, all_56_3) = all_98_0 & vvar(all_100_0) =
% 19.11/3.58  | | |         all_56_2 & $i(all_100_0)
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | ALPHA: (47) implies:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (48)  $i(all_100_0)
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (49)  vvar(all_100_0) = all_56_2
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (50)  vlookup(all_100_0, all_56_3) = all_98_0
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with all_56_7, all_100_0, all_56_2,
% 19.11/3.58  | | |              simplifying with (24), (25), (48), (49) gives:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (51)  all_100_0 = all_56_7
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | REDUCE: (50), (51) imply:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (52)  vlookup(all_56_7, all_56_3) = all_98_0
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (22) with all_56_8, all_56_7, all_56_3,
% 19.11/3.58  | | |              all_98_0, all_56_9, simplifying with (4), (5), (6), (21),
% 19.11/3.58  | | |              (25), (44), (52) gives:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (53)  vsomeType(all_56_9) = all_98_0
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_56_4, all_56_9, all_98_0,
% 19.11/3.58  | | |              simplifying with (10), (21), (45), (53) gives:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (54)  all_56_4 = all_56_9
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | REDUCE: (27), (54) imply:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (55)  vtcheck(all_56_8, all_56_6, all_56_9) = all_56_0
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with 0, all_56_0, all_56_9, all_56_6,
% 19.11/3.58  | | |              all_56_8, simplifying with (13), (55) gives:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (56)  all_56_0 = 0
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | REDUCE: (19), (56) imply:
% 19.11/3.58  | | |   (57)  $false
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | | CLOSE: (57) is inconsistent.
% 19.11/3.58  | | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | | End of split
% 19.11/3.58  | | 
% 19.11/3.58  | End of split
% 19.11/3.58  | 
% 19.11/3.58  End of proof
% 19.11/3.58  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.11/3.58  
% 19.11/3.58  2915ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------