TSTP Solution File: COM016+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COM016+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.69s 2.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   38
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (   6 unt;  35 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (   9   ~;  13   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   61 (  29   >;  32   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (;   1   !;   4   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtmndtplgtdt0 > sdtmndtasgtdt0 > aReductOfIn0 > aNormalFormOfIn0 > iLess0 > isTerminating0 > isLocallyConfluent0 > isConfluent0 > aRewritingSystem0 > aElement0 > #nlpp > xc > xb > xa > xR > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_17 > #skF_1 > #skF_20 > #skF_4 > #skF_18 > #skF_12 > #skF_8 > #skF_13 > #skF_10 > #skF_2 > #skF_19 > #skF_6 > #skF_21 > #skF_15 > #skF_14 > #skF_3 > #skF_11 > #skF_16

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff(sdtmndtplgtdt0,type,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(aReductOfIn0,type,
    aReductOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xa,type,
    xa: $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i > $i ).

tff(isTerminating0,type,
    isTerminating0: $i > $o ).

tff(aNormalFormOfIn0,type,
    aNormalFormOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xR,type,
    xR: $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xc,type,
    xc: $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(xb,type,
    xb: $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i > $i ).

tff(aRewritingSystem0,type,
    aRewritingSystem0: $i > $o ).

tff(isConfluent0,type,
    isConfluent0: $i > $o ).

tff(isLocallyConfluent0,type,
    isLocallyConfluent0: $i > $o ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sdtmndtasgtdt0,type,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_268,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xa)
    & aElement0(xb)
    & aElement0(xc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731) ).

tff(f_380,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [W0] :
        ( aElement0(W0)
        & aReductOfIn0(W0,xa,xR)
        & ( ( W0 = xb )
          | aReductOfIn0(xb,W0,xR)
          | ? [W1] :
              ( aElement0(W1)
              & aReductOfIn0(W1,W0,xR)
              & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W1,xR,xb) )
          | sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xb)
          | sdtmndtasgtdt0(W0,xR,xb) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(f_360,hypothesis,
    ( ( aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
      | ? [W0] :
          ( aElement0(W0)
          & aReductOfIn0(W0,xa,xR)
          & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xb) ) )
    & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xb)
    & ( aReductOfIn0(xc,xa,xR)
      | ? [W0] :
          ( aElement0(W0)
          & aReductOfIn0(W0,xa,xR)
          & sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0,xR,xc) ) )
    & sdtmndtplgtdt0(xa,xR,xc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__731_02) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    aElement0(xb),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_268]) ).

tff(c_702,plain,
    ( ~ aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR)
    | ~ aElement0(xb) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_380]) ).

tff(c_704,plain,
    ~ aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_124,c_702]) ).

tff(c_692,plain,
    ( aElement0('#skF_21')
    | aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_360]) ).

tff(c_705,plain,
    aElement0('#skF_21'),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_692]) ).

tff(c_690,plain,
    ( aReductOfIn0('#skF_21',xa,xR)
    | aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_360]) ).

tff(c_707,plain,
    aReductOfIn0('#skF_21',xa,xR),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_690]) ).

tff(c_688,plain,
    ( sdtmndtplgtdt0('#skF_21',xR,xb)
    | aReductOfIn0(xb,xa,xR) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_360]) ).

tff(c_706,plain,
    sdtmndtplgtdt0('#skF_21',xR,xb),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_688]) ).

tff(c_714,plain,
    ! [W0_123] :
      ( ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(W0_123,xR,xb)
      | ~ aReductOfIn0(W0_123,xa,xR)
      | ~ aElement0(W0_123) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_380]) ).

tff(c_717,plain,
    ( ~ aReductOfIn0('#skF_21',xa,xR)
    | ~ aElement0('#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_706,c_714]) ).

tff(c_724,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_705,c_707,c_717]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : COM016+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:55:24 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.69/2.79  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.69/2.79  
% 7.69/2.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.69/2.82  
% 7.69/2.82  Inference rules
% 7.69/2.82  ----------------------
% 7.69/2.82  #Ref     : 0
% 7.69/2.82  #Sup     : 2
% 7.69/2.82  #Fact    : 0
% 7.69/2.82  #Define  : 0
% 7.69/2.82  #Split   : 1
% 7.69/2.82  #Chain   : 0
% 7.69/2.82  #Close   : 0
% 7.69/2.82  
% 7.69/2.82  Ordering : KBO
% 7.69/2.82  
% 7.69/2.82  Simplification rules
% 7.69/2.82  ----------------------
% 7.69/2.82  #Subsume      : 2
% 7.69/2.82  #Demod        : 3
% 7.69/2.82  #Tautology    : 4
% 7.69/2.82  #SimpNegUnit  : 3
% 7.69/2.82  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.69/2.82  
% 7.69/2.82  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.69/2.82  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.69/2.82  
% 7.69/2.82  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.69/2.82  ----------------------
% 7.69/2.82  Preprocessing        : 0.82
% 7.69/2.82  Parsing              : 0.34
% 7.69/2.82  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 7.69/2.82  Main loop            : 0.94
% 7.69/2.82  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 7.69/2.82  Reduction            : 0.28
% 7.69/2.82  Demodulation         : 0.19
% 7.69/2.83  BG Simplification    : 0.12
% 7.69/2.83  Subsumption          : 0.49
% 7.69/2.83  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 7.69/2.83  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.69/2.83  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.69/2.83  Total                : 1.81
% 7.69/2.83  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.69/2.83  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.69/2.83  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.69/2.83  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------