TSTP Solution File: COM012+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:08:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  47   ~;  53   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mTCTrans,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aRewritingSystem0(X2)
        & aElement0(X3)
        & aElement0(X4) )
     => ( ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
          & sdtmndtplgtdt0(X3,X2,X4) )
       => sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCTrans) ).

fof(mTCRDef,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aElement0(X1)
        & aRewritingSystem0(X2)
        & aElement0(X3) )
     => ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
      <=> ( X1 = X3
          | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mTCRDef) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
      & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz) )
   => sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m__349,hypothesis,
    ( aElement0(xx)
    & aRewritingSystem0(xR)
    & aElement0(xy)
    & aElement0(xz) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__349) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X13)
      | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X14)
      | ~ aElement0(X15)
      | ~ aElement0(X16)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X13,X14,X15)
      | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X15,X14,X16)
      | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X13,X14,X16) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mTCTrans])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(X7,X8,X9)
        | X7 = X9
        | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X7,X8,X9)
        | ~ aElement0(X7)
        | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X8)
        | ~ aElement0(X9) )
      & ( X7 != X9
        | sdtmndtasgtdt0(X7,X8,X9)
        | ~ aElement0(X7)
        | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X8)
        | ~ aElement0(X9) )
      & ( ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X7,X8,X9)
        | sdtmndtasgtdt0(X7,X8,X9)
        | ~ aElement0(X7)
        | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X8)
        | ~ aElement0(X9) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mTCRDef])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
        & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz) )
     => sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X4)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X3,X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy)
    & sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz)
    & ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X4)
    | ~ aElement0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aElement0(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0(xy,xR,xz),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aRewritingSystem0(xR),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__349]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xz),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__349]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xy),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__349]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ aElement0(X1)
    | ~ aRewritingSystem0(X2)
    | ~ aElement0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( xz = xy
    | sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xz)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xy)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( xz = xy
    | sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,xz)
    | ~ sdtmndtplgtdt0(X1,xR,xy)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xz),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( xz = xy
    | X1 = xy
    | sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,xz)
    | ~ sdtmndtasgtdt0(X1,xR,xy)
    | ~ aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_8]),c_0_12]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sdtmndtasgtdt0(xx,xR,xy),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    aElement0(xx),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__349]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( xx = xy
    | xz = xy ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    xz = xy,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem    : COM012+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 10:33:07 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # new_bool_3 with pid 19297 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # new_ho_10 with pid 19300 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # partial match(1): FGUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.18/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 35
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.18/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.18/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 22
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.18/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 21
% 0.18/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 40
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of those cached                   : 33
% 0.18/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.18/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 39
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.18/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.18/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.18/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 35
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1808
% 0.18/0.47  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 205
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.18/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------