TSTP Solution File: COM004-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:10:22 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.17s 1.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ failure_node(X0,or(X1,X2))
| ~ failure_node(X3,or(X4,X5))
| ~ contradictory(X2,X5)
| ~ siblings(X0,X3)
| failure_node(parent_of(X0,X3),or(X1,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',make_node) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
contradictory(X0,negate(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_contradicts_not_x) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
siblings(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_and_n_right_are_siblings) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_is_atom) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_is_not_atom) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
left_child_of(n) = n_left,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_equals_left_child_of_n) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
right_child_of(n) = n_right,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_equals_right_child_of_n) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
~ failure_node(X0,or(empty,empty)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_is_there_an_empty_node) ).
cnf(c_103,plain,
( left_child_of(X0) != X1
| right_child_of(X0) != X2
| ~ failure_node(X1,or(X3,X4))
| ~ failure_node(X2,or(X5,X6))
| ~ contradictory(X4,X6)
| failure_node(parent_of(X1,X2),or(X3,X5)) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_104,plain,
( ~ failure_node(left_child_of(X0),or(X1,X2))
| ~ failure_node(right_child_of(X0),or(X3,X4))
| ~ contradictory(X2,X4)
| failure_node(parent_of(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),or(X1,X3)) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_103]) ).
cnf(c_216,plain,
or(empty,empty) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_217,negated_conjecture,
~ failure_node(X0,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_216]) ).
cnf(c_386,plain,
( ~ failure_node(right_child_of(n),or(X0,X1))
| ~ failure_node(n_left,or(X2,X3))
| ~ contradictory(X3,X1)
| failure_node(parent_of(left_child_of(n),right_child_of(n)),or(X2,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_104]) ).
cnf(c_388,plain,
( ~ failure_node(n_left,or(X0,X1))
| ~ failure_node(n_right,or(X2,X3))
| ~ contradictory(X1,X3)
| failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(X0,X2)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_55,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_402,plain,
( ~ failure_node(n_right,or(X0,X1))
| ~ contradictory(atom,X1)
| failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(empty,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_388]) ).
cnf(c_414,plain,
( ~ contradictory(atom,negate(atom))
| failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),or(empty,empty)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_402]) ).
cnf(c_416,plain,
( ~ contradictory(atom,negate(atom))
| failure_node(parent_of(n_left,n_right),sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_414,c_216]) ).
cnf(c_417,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_416,c_217,c_51]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:13:21 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.17/1.21 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.21 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ iProver source info
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.17/1.21 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.17/1.21 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 clauses 9
% 2.17/1.21 conjectures 1
% 2.17/1.21 EPR 1
% 2.17/1.21 Horn 9
% 2.17/1.21 unary 8
% 2.17/1.21 binary 0
% 2.17/1.21 lits 12
% 2.17/1.21 lits eq 3
% 2.17/1.21 fd_pure 0
% 2.17/1.21 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.17/1.21 fd_cond 0
% 2.17/1.21 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.17/1.21 AC symbols 0
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------
% 2.17/1.21 Current options:
% 2.17/1.21 ------
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 ------ Proving...
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.17/1.21
% 2.17/1.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------