TSTP Solution File: COM004-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:53:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 5 ~; 4 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f14,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f12,f3,f5,f9,f6,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ failure_node(X0,or(X2,X4))
| ~ contradictory(X4,X5)
| ~ failure_node(X1,or(X3,X5))
| failure_node(parent_of(X0,X1),or(X2,X3))
| ~ siblings(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',make_node) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
failure_node(n_right,or(empty,negate(atom))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_is_not_atom) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X6] : ~ failure_node(X6,or(empty,empty)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_is_there_an_empty_node) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
failure_node(n_left,or(empty,atom)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_is_atom) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] : contradictory(X0,negate(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_contradicts_not_x) ).
fof(f12,plain,
siblings(n_left,n_right),
inference(superposition,[],[f10,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
n_right = right_child_of(n),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_right_equals_right_child_of_n) ).
fof(f10,plain,
siblings(n_left,right_child_of(n)),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
n_left = left_child_of(n),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_equals_left_child_of_n) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : siblings(left_child_of(X0),right_child_of(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n_left_and_n_right_are_siblings) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COM004-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 17:02:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 % (2965)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (2957)dis+21_1:1_av=off:fd=off:lcm=predicate:sos=on:spb=goal:urr=ec_only:i=42:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/42Mi)
% 0.20/0.50 % (2969)lrs+30_1:12_av=off:bs=unit_only:fsd=on:gs=on:lwlo=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:slsqr=1,2:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (2961)dis+1011_1:16_fsr=off:nwc=2.0:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51 % (2961)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.51 % (2975)lrs+1011_1:1_afp=100000:afr=on:amm=sco:bd=preordered:cond=fast:newcnf=on:nm=4:sos=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Memory used [KB]: 1279
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Time elapsed: 0.117 s
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (2957)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 % (2955)Success in time 0.163 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------