TSTP Solution File: COM002_20 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : COM002_20 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:07:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_22)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4: label,X2: state,X1: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,X2)
| ~ has(X2,goto(X4))
| ~ labels(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
has(p8,goto(loop)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_8]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
has(p4,goto(out)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_4]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X5: boolean,X2: state,X1: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,X2)
| ~ has(X2,ifthen(X5,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
has(p3,ifthen(equal_function(register_j,n),p4)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
! [X1: state] :
( ~ labels(loop,X1)
| ~ fails(X1,p8) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
labels(loop,p3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[label_state_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,plain,
! [X1: state,X3: state,X2: state] :
( fails(X1,X3)
| fails(X3,X2)
| ~ fails(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
! [X1: state] :
( ~ labels(out,X1)
| ~ fails(X1,p4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_31,plain,
! [X1: state,X2: state] :
( ~ fails(X1,X2)
| ~ follows(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
~ fails(p4,p3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
~ fails(p3,p8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
has(p7,assign(register_j,plus(register_j,n1))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_7]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
has(p6,assign(register_k,times(n2,register_k))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_6]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
has(p2,assign(register_k,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_2]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
has(p1,assign(register_j,n0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[state_1]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
follows(p8,p7),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_7_to_8]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
follows(p7,p6),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_6_to_7]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
follows(p6,p3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_3_to_6]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
follows(p5,p4),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_4_to_5]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
follows(p3,p2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_2_to_3]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
follows(p2,p1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[transition_1_to_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COM002_20 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 10:24:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 20816 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 20822 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses : 50
% 0.19/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 32
% 0.19/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.19/0.46 # Processed clauses : 40
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.19/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.19/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.19/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.19/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 0.19/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40
% 0.19/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.19/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.19/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1034
% 0.19/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 66
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.19/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------