TSTP Solution File: COM002_2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.51s 1.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   41
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   63 (  19 unt;  32 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  17   ~;  14   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    7 (   6 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  10   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   22 (  22 usr;  16 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ labels > has > follows > fails > times > plus > ifthen > equal_function > assign > #nlpp > goto > register_k > register_j > p8 > p7 > p6 > p5 > p4 > p3 > p2 > p1 > out > n2 > n1 > n0 > n > loop

%Foreground sorts:
tff(label,type,
    label: $tType ).

tff(state,type,
    state: $tType ).

tff(statement,type,
    statement: $tType ).

tff(boolean,type,
    boolean: $tType ).

tff(register,type,
    register: $tType ).

tff(number,type,
    number: $tType ).

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(n1,type,
    n1: number ).

tff(out,type,
    out: label ).

tff(register_k,type,
    register_k: register ).

tff(goto,type,
    goto: label > statement ).

tff(fails,type,
    fails: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(equal_function,type,
    equal_function: ( register * number ) > boolean ).

tff(register_j,type,
    register_j: register ).

tff(n0,type,
    n0: number ).

tff(p8,type,
    p8: state ).

tff(labels,type,
    labels: ( label * state ) > $o ).

tff(p6,type,
    p6: state ).

tff(p7,type,
    p7: state ).

tff(assign,type,
    assign: ( register * number ) > statement ).

tff(ifthen,type,
    ifthen: ( boolean * state ) > statement ).

tff(p2,type,
    p2: state ).

tff(times,type,
    times: ( number * register ) > number ).

tff(p5,type,
    p5: state ).

tff(n2,type,
    n2: number ).

tff(has,type,
    has: ( state * statement ) > $o ).

tff(plus,type,
    plus: ( register * number ) > number ).

tff(n,type,
    n: number ).

tff(p1,type,
    p1: state ).

tff(loop,type,
    loop: label ).

tff(p3,type,
    p3: state ).

tff(follows,type,
    follows: ( state * state ) > $o ).

tff(p4,type,
    p4: state ).

tff(f_65,hypothesis,
    follows(p6,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [Start_state: state,Goal_state: state] :
      ~ ( fails(Goal_state,Start_state)
        & follows(Goal_state,Start_state) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).

tff(f_70,hypothesis,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).

tff(f_60,hypothesis,
    labels(loop,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [Label: label,Start_state: state,Goal_state: state] :
      ~ ( fails(Goal_state,Start_state)
        & has(Start_state,goto(Label))
        & labels(Label,Goal_state) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).

tff(f_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ fails(p3,p3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).

tff(f_44,axiom,
    ! [Intermediate_state: state,Start_state: state,Goal_state: state] :
      ( fails(Goal_state,Start_state)
     => ( fails(Goal_state,Intermediate_state)
        | fails(Intermediate_state,Start_state) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).

tff(f_69,hypothesis,
    follows(p8,p7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).

tff(f_67,hypothesis,
    follows(p7,p6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    follows(p6,p3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    ! [Goal_state_12: state,Start_state_13: state] :
      ( ~ follows(Goal_state_12,Start_state_13)
      | ~ fails(Goal_state_12,Start_state_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    ~ fails(p6,p3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_39]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    has(p8,goto(loop)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    labels(loop,p3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ! [Label_20: label,Goal_state_21: state,Start_state_22: state] :
      ( ~ labels(Label_20,Goal_state_21)
      | ~ has(Start_state_22,goto(Label_20))
      | ~ fails(Goal_state_21,Start_state_22) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_160,plain,
    ! [Start_state_26: state] :
      ( ~ has(Start_state_26,goto(loop))
      | ~ fails(p3,Start_state_26) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_73]) ).

tff(c_164,plain,
    ~ fails(p3,p8),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_160]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    fails(p3,p3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).

tff(c_69,plain,
    ! [Intermediate_state_17: state,Start_state_18: state,Goal_state_19: state] :
      ( fails(Intermediate_state_17,Start_state_18)
      | fails(Goal_state_19,Intermediate_state_17)
      | ~ fails(Goal_state_19,Start_state_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_93,plain,
    ! [Intermediate_state_23: state] :
      ( fails(Intermediate_state_23,p3)
      | fails(p3,Intermediate_state_23) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_69]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [Intermediate_state_3: state,Start_state_4: state,Goal_state_5: state] :
      ( fails(Intermediate_state_3,Start_state_4)
      | fails(Goal_state_5,Intermediate_state_3)
      | ~ fails(Goal_state_5,Start_state_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).

tff(c_240,plain,
    ! [Intermediate_state_28: state,Intermediate_state_29: state] :
      ( fails(Intermediate_state_28,p3)
      | fails(Intermediate_state_29,Intermediate_state_28)
      | fails(p3,Intermediate_state_29) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_4]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    follows(p8,p7),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ~ fails(p8,p7),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_39]) ).

tff(c_263,plain,
    ( fails(p7,p3)
    | fails(p3,p8) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_240,c_60]) ).

tff(c_289,plain,
    fails(p7,p3),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_263]) ).

tff(c_300,plain,
    ! [Intermediate_state_30: state] :
      ( fails(Intermediate_state_30,p3)
      | fails(p7,Intermediate_state_30) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_4]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    follows(p7,p6),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_67]) ).

tff(c_63,plain,
    ~ fails(p7,p6),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_39]) ).

tff(c_309,plain,
    fails(p6,p3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_300,c_63]) ).

tff(c_315,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_309]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : COM002_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:04:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.51/1.83  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/1.84  
% 3.51/1.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.72/1.87  
% 3.72/1.87  Inference rules
% 3.72/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.72/1.87  #Ref     : 0
% 3.72/1.87  #Sup     : 51
% 3.72/1.87  #Fact    : 8
% 3.72/1.87  #Define  : 0
% 3.72/1.87  #Split   : 0
% 3.72/1.87  #Chain   : 0
% 3.72/1.87  #Close   : 0
% 3.72/1.87  
% 3.72/1.87  Ordering : KBO
% 3.72/1.87  
% 3.72/1.87  Simplification rules
% 3.72/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.72/1.87  #Subsume      : 3
% 3.72/1.87  #Demod        : 16
% 3.72/1.87  #Tautology    : 14
% 3.72/1.87  #SimpNegUnit  : 4
% 3.72/1.87  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.72/1.87  
% 3.72/1.87  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.72/1.87  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.72/1.87  
% 3.72/1.87  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.72/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.75/1.87  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 3.75/1.87  Parsing              : 0.31
% 3.75/1.87  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.75/1.87  Main loop            : 0.35
% 3.75/1.87  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 3.75/1.87  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.75/1.87  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.75/1.87  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.75/1.87  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.75/1.87  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.75/1.87  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.75/1.87  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.75/1.87  Total                : 0.91
% 3.75/1.87  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.75/1.87  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.75/1.87  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.75/1.87  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------