TSTP Solution File: COM002-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : COM002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:53:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 12 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f144,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f140,f38]) ).
fof(f38,plain,
~ fails(p3,p8),
inference(resolution,[],[f35,f8]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
labels(loop,p3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_state_3) ).
fof(f35,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ labels(loop,X1)
| ~ fails(X1,p8) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
has(p8,goto(loop)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',state_8) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ has(X1,goto(X3))
| ~ labels(X3,X0)
| ~ fails(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goto_success) ).
fof(f140,plain,
fails(p3,p8),
inference(resolution,[],[f69,f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
~ fails(p8,p7),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f17]) ).
fof(f17,axiom,
follows(p8,p7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_7_to_8) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ follows(X0,X1)
| ~ fails(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',direct_success) ).
fof(f69,plain,
! [X0] :
( fails(X0,p7)
| fails(p3,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f65,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ fails(X0,X1)
| fails(X2,X1)
| fails(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_success) ).
fof(f65,plain,
fails(p3,p7),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f55,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
~ fails(p6,p3),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
follows(p6,p3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_3_to_6) ).
fof(f55,plain,
( fails(p6,p3)
| fails(p3,p7) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f29,f24]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
~ fails(p7,p6),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f15]) ).
fof(f15,axiom,
follows(p7,p6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transition_6_to_7) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( fails(X0,p3)
| fails(p3,X1)
| fails(X1,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f27,f2]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X0] :
( fails(p3,X0)
| fails(X0,p3) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f19]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
fails(p3,p3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_a_loop_through_p3) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : COM002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 17:23:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.49 % (13259)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (13251)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (13244)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (13243)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (13252)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.50 TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.50 % (13244)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.50 % (13260)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 % (13247)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.19/0.50 TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.50 % (13246)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (13247)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.51 % (13248)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (13249)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.51 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.51
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Time elapsed: 0.106 s
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (13244)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.51 % (13236)Success in time 0.159 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------