TSTP Solution File: COL124-2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BGJ4eNubPr true
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:35:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BGJ4eNubPr true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:16:53 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE start: 3
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % PE start: 3
% 0.21/0.74 logic: neq
% 0.21/0.74 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % done 3 iterations in 0.007s
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.74 thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_type, type, tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(tc_prod_type, type, tc_prod: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_in_type, type, c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_Pair_type, type, c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_Comb_Ocontract_type, type, c_Comb_Ocontract: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(c_Comb_OI_type, type, c_Comb_OI: $i).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(cls_Comb_Ocontract_OK_0, axiom,
% 0.21/0.74 (c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ V_x ) @ V_y ) @
% 0.21/0.74 V_x @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 (c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 (c_Pair @
% 0.21/0.74 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.21/0.74 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ X0) @ X1) @
% 0.21/0.74 X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_Ocontract_OK_0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(cls_conjecture_0, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.74 (~( ( ~( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @ V_U @ V_V @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @ V_U @ V_W @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @
% 0.21/0.74 V_V @ ( v_x @ V_U @ V_V @ V_W ) @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.74 (( ~( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @ V_U @ V_V @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( ~( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @ V_U @ V_W @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) |
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @
% 0.21/0.74 V_V @ ( v_x @ V_U @ V_V @ V_W ) @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) )),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ X0 @ X1 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ X0 @ X2 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.21/0.74 | (c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 (c_Pair @ X1 @ (v_x @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @
% 0.21/0.74 tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb)))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(cls_Comb_OI__contract__E_0, axiom,
% 0.21/0.74 (~( c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 ( c_Pair @ c_Comb_OI @ V_z @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ))).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 ~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ c_Comb_OI @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_OI__contract__E_0])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ X1 @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.21/0.74 | ~ (c_in @
% 0.21/0.74 (c_Pair @ X1 @ c_Comb_OI @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb)))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.21/0.74 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.74 ~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ X0 @ c_Comb_OI @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @
% 0.21/0.74 c_Comb_Ocontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('condensation', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.21/0.74 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.74 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % Terminating...
% 1.30/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.30/0.87 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------