TSTP Solution File: COL124-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:46:02 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X4),X5),X4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OK_0) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(factoring,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X3] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_OI__contract__E_0) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Pair(X0,v_x(X1,X0,X2),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:31:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % (32175)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-32175"
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Memory used [KB]: 748
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (32178)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (32175)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------