TSTP Solution File: COL124-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:45:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.71s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,X4),X5),X4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbnf7gSf8e/Vampire---4.8_10735',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OK_0) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X0] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(factoring,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( c_in(c_Pair(X0,v_x(X1,X0,X2),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbnf7gSf8e/Vampire---4.8_10735',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X3] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbnf7gSf8e/Vampire---4.8_10735',cls_Comb_OI__contract__E_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:31:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.12/0.34 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tbnf7gSf8e/Vampire---4.8_10735
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10851)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.71
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Memory used [KB]: 944
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10851)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-10843"
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10850)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.55/0.71
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Memory used [KB]: 945
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10850)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.71 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.55/0.71 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.71
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Memory used [KB]: 971
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.55/0.71 % (10844)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.55/0.71 % (10843)Success in time 0.371 s
% 0.55/0.71 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------