TSTP Solution File: COL124-2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,u,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('COL124-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,u),v),u,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('COL124-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(u,v,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(u,w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(v,v_x(u,v,w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('COL124-2.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(u,v,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(u,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,1]),
[iquote('0:Res:3.2,1.0')] ).
cnf(7,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(u,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(con,[status(thm)],[6]),
[iquote('0:Con:6.0')] ).
cnf(8,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[7,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:7.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 31 13:30:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.40 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.40 SPASS derived 1 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 4 clauses.
% 0.19/0.40 SPASS allocated 63085 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.40 SPASS spent 0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.40 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.40 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.40 Formulae used in the proof : cls_Comb_OI__contract__E_0 cls_Comb_Ocontract_OK_0 cls_conjecture_0
% 0.19/0.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------