TSTP Solution File: COL124-2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:35:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.65s 1.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 6 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 5 >; 9 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 (; 16 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ c_in > c_Pair > v_x > tc_prod > c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D > #nlpp > tc_Comb_Ocomb > c_Comb_Ocontract > c_Comb_Ocomb_OK > c_Comb_OI
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(c_Comb_Ocontract,type,
c_Comb_Ocontract: $i ).
tff(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i ).
tff(tc_prod,type,
tc_prod: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Comb_OI,type,
c_Comb_OI: $i ).
tff(c_in,type,
c_in: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(v_x,type,
v_x: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Pair,type,
c_Pair: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D,type,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(tc_Comb_Ocomb,type,
tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [V_x,V_y] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,V_x),V_y),V_x,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_33,axiom,
! [V_V,V_U,V_W] :
( c_in(c_Pair(V_V,v_x(V_U,V_V,V_W),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U,V_W,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U,V_V,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_36,axiom,
! [V_z] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,V_z,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [V_x_5,V_y_6] : c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,V_x_5),V_y_6),V_x_5,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_9,plain,
! [V_U_10,V_V_11,V_W_12] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U_10,V_V_11,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U_10,V_W_12,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(V_V_11,v_x(V_U_10,V_V_11,V_W_12),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [V_z_4] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_OI,V_z_4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).
tff(c_15,plain,
! [V_U_13,V_W_14] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U_13,c_Comb_OI,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(V_U_13,V_W_14,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_4]) ).
tff(c_20,plain,
! [V_y_15,V_W_16] : ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK,c_Comb_OI),V_y_15),V_W_16,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_15]) ).
tff(c_30,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_20]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : COL124-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 18:03:13 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.65/1.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.65/1.66
% 2.65/1.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.65/1.69
% 2.65/1.69 Inference rules
% 2.65/1.69 ----------------------
% 2.65/1.69 #Ref : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Sup : 4
% 2.65/1.69 #Fact : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Define : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Split : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Chain : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Close : 0
% 2.65/1.69
% 2.65/1.69 Ordering : KBO
% 2.65/1.69
% 2.65/1.69 Simplification rules
% 2.65/1.69 ----------------------
% 2.65/1.69 #Subsume : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Demod : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Tautology : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.65/1.69 #BackRed : 0
% 2.65/1.69
% 2.65/1.69 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.65/1.69 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.65/1.69
% 2.65/1.69 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.65/1.69 ----------------------
% 2.65/1.70 Preprocessing : 0.41
% 2.65/1.70 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.65/1.70 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.65/1.70 Main loop : 0.14
% 2.65/1.70 Inferencing : 0.07
% 2.65/1.70 Reduction : 0.03
% 2.65/1.70 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.65/1.70 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.65/1.70 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.65/1.70 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.65/1.70 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.65/1.70 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.65/1.70 Total : 0.60
% 2.65/1.70 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.65/1.70 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.65/1.70 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.65/1.70 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------