TSTP Solution File: COL118-2 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 1.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X3),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
cnf(c_73,plain,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_74,plain,
tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_75,plain,
c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_76,plain,
c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(sP0_iProver_def,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(sP2_iProver_def,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_75,c_74,c_73]) ).
cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
c_in(sP3_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_76]) ).
cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
c_in(sP4_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_77]) ).
cnf(c_230,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(X0,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_232,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X3),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_239,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| c_in(c_Pair(sP0_iProver_def,c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_232]) ).
cnf(c_266,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| c_in(c_Pair(sP0_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_239]) ).
cnf(c_268,plain,
( ~ c_in(sP3_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ c_in(sP4_iProver_def,c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def)
| c_in(c_Pair(sP0_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_266,c_76,c_77]) ).
cnf(c_269,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(sP0_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_80,c_79]) ).
cnf(c_274,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(sP2_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,sP1_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_275,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_230]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:26:59 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.45/1.14 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ iProver source info
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.45/1.14 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.45/1.14 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 clauses 10
% 0.45/1.14 conjectures 3
% 0.45/1.14 EPR 2
% 0.45/1.14 Horn 10
% 0.45/1.14 unary 8
% 0.45/1.14 binary 1
% 0.45/1.14 lits 13
% 0.45/1.14 lits eq 5
% 0.45/1.14 fd_pure 0
% 0.45/1.14 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.45/1.14 fd_cond 0
% 0.45/1.14 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.45/1.14 AC symbols 0
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------
% 0.45/1.14 Current options:
% 0.45/1.14 ------
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.14
% 0.45/1.14
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------