TSTP Solution File: COL118-2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 04:45:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 11 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f24,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f19,f21,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( $false
| spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f18,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
( $false
| spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f14,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f16,f12]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X1] : c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4] :
( c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X4,X3),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X4,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 18:29:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % (17239)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-17239"
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Memory used [KB]: 748
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (17242)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (17239)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------