TSTP Solution File: COL118-2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_x,v_ya,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0,axiom,
c_in(c_Pair(X,X,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).
cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X,Y,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(Z,U,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(Z,X),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(U,Y),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
cnf(6,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_ya,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2,cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0]) ).
cnf(11,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0,cls_conjecture_1,cls_conjecture_0]),6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL118-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:15:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T09:15:24
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T09:15:24
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 #||
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 ||#
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.50 ; 25 formulas have been input or derived (from 6 formulas).
% 0.20/0.50 ; 11 (44%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.50 ; 11 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.50 ;
% 0.20/0.50 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.002 7% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Assert (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.003 11% Process new row (11 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Resolution (10 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Forward simplification (11 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (11 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.022 81% Other
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.027 Total
% 0.20/0.50 ; 0.029 Real time
% 0.20/0.50 ;
% 0.20/0.50 ; Term-hash-array has 37 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.50 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2 entries (2 at peak, 2 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 42 nodes (42 at peak, 42 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Retrieved 0 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2 calls.
% 0.20/0.50 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2 calls.
% 0.20/0.50 ; Path-index has 43 entries (43 at peak, 43 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Path-index has 105 nodes (105 at peak, 105 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Trie-index has 43 entries (43 at peak, 43 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Trie-index has 190 nodes (190 at peak, 190 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Retrieved 9 generalization terms in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.50 ; Retrieved 14 instance terms in 8 calls.
% 0.20/0.50 ; Retrieved 128 unifiable terms in 71 calls.
% 0.20/0.50 ;
% 0.20/0.50 ; The agenda of rows to process has 14 entries:
% 0.20/0.50 ; 14 with value 18
% 0.20/0.50 ; The agenda of rows to give has 5 entries:
% 0.20/0.50 ; 5 with value (4 18)
% 0.20/0.50 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.50 0.029 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.50 0.025836 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.50 0.003229 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.50 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.50 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.50 1,945,072 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.50 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.50 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T09:15:24
% 0.20/0.50 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.50 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------