TSTP Solution File: COL114-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : COL114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AOdmC7YocO true

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:34:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COL114-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AOdmC7YocO true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:49:11 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.51/0.61  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.51/0.61  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.51/0.61  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.53/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.54/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.54/0.81  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.54/0.81  % BCE start: 35
% 0.54/0.81  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.81  % PE start: 35
% 0.54/0.81  logic: eq
% 0.54/0.81  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.54/0.81  % done 22 iterations in 0.072s
% 0.54/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.54/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.54/0.81  thf(c_in_type, type, c_in: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(c_Comb_Oparcontract_type, type, c_Comb_Oparcontract: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(v_x_type, type, v_x: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_OK_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_OK: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(v_x_H_type, type, v_x_H: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(tc_prod_type, type, tc_prod: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(v_w_type, type, v_w: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(tc_Comb_Ocomb_type, type, tc_Comb_Ocomb: $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(c_Pair_type, type, c_Pair: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D_type, type, c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(cls_conjecture_2, conjecture,
% 0.54/0.81    (~( ( ~( c_in @
% 0.54/0.81             ( c_Pair @ v_x @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) | 
% 0.54/0.81        ( ~( c_in @
% 0.54/0.81             ( c_Pair @
% 0.54/0.81               ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.54/0.81                 ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81               V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) ))).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.81    (( ~( c_in @
% 0.54/0.81          ( c_Pair @ v_x @ V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) ) | 
% 0.54/0.81     ( ~( c_in @
% 0.54/0.81          ( c_Pair @
% 0.54/0.81            ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.54/0.81              ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H ) @ v_w ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81            V_U @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ) )),
% 0.54/0.81    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_2])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 0.54/0.81      (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.54/0.81         (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_x @ X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.54/0.81             c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))
% 0.54/0.81          | ~ (c_in @ 
% 0.54/0.81               (c_Pair @ 
% 0.54/0.81                (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ 
% 0.54/0.81                 (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ v_x_H) @ v_w) @ 
% 0.54/0.81                X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.54/0.81               c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb)))),
% 0.54/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0, axiom,
% 0.54/0.81    (c_in @
% 0.54/0.81     ( c_Pair @
% 0.54/0.81       ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @
% 0.54/0.81         ( c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ V_x ) @ V_y ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81       V_x @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ))).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.54/0.81      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.54/0.81          (c_in @ 
% 0.54/0.81           (c_Pair @ 
% 0.54/0.81            (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ 
% 0.54/0.81             (c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D @ c_Comb_Ocomb_OK @ X0) @ X1) @ 
% 0.54/0.81            X0 @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.54/0.81           c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.54/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__2_0])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl126, plain,
% 0.54/0.81      (~ (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_x @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.54/0.81          c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.54/0.81      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(cls_conjecture_1, conjecture,
% 0.54/0.81    (~( c_in @
% 0.54/0.81        ( c_Pair @ v_x @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81        c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) ))).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.81    (c_in @
% 0.54/0.81     ( c_Pair @ v_x @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb ) @ 
% 0.54/0.81     c_Comb_Oparcontract @ ( tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb )),
% 0.54/0.81    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [cls_conjecture_1])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 0.54/0.81      ( (c_in @ (c_Pair @ v_x @ v_x_H @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb) @ 
% 0.54/0.81         c_Comb_Oparcontract @ (tc_prod @ tc_Comb_Ocomb @ tc_Comb_Ocomb))),
% 0.54/0.81      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.54/0.81  thf(zip_derived_cl127, plain, ($false),
% 0.54/0.81      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl126, zip_derived_cl33])).
% 0.54/0.81  
% 0.54/0.81  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.54/0.81  
% 0.54/0.81  
% 0.54/0.81  % Terminating...
% 0.54/0.83  % Runner terminated.
% 0.54/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------