TSTP Solution File: COL113-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : COL113-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:29:11 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.51s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    6 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KZUypElKEp/E---3.1_26568.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KZUypElKEp/E---3.1_26568.p',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0) ).

cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y_H,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    c_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    c_in(c_Pair(X1,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
    cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__1_0 ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : COL113-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:36:35 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.45/0.60  Running first-order model finding
% 0.45/0.60  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KZUypElKEp/E---3.1_26568.p
% 0.51/0.63  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.51/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # new_bool_3 with pid 26706 completed with status 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.51/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.51/0.63  # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/0.63  # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 100s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 26709 completed with status 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.51/0.63  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.51/0.63  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.51/0.63  # Search class: FHUSM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/0.63  # partial match(1): FHUPM-FFMF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.51/0.63  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.51/0.63  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 100s (1) cores
% 0.51/0.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.51/0.63  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.51/0.63  
% 0.51/0.63  # Proof found!
% 0.51/0.63  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.51/0.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.51/0.63  # Parsed axioms                        : 1404
% 0.51/0.63  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1381
% 0.51/0.63  # Initial clauses                      : 23
% 0.51/0.63  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 0.51/0.63  # Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.51/0.63  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.51/0.63  # ...remaining for further processing  : 25
% 0.51/0.63  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.51/0.63  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.51/0.63  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.51/0.63  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 0.51/0.63  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.51/0.63  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.51/0.63  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.51/0.63  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.51/0.63  # ...number of literals in the above   : 25
% 0.51/0.63  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.51/0.63  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.51/0.63  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.51/0.63  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.51/0.63  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.51/0.63  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9198
% 0.51/0.63  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2879
% 0.51/0.63  
% 0.51/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.63  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.51/0.63  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.51/0.63  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.51/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 2936 pages
% 0.51/0.63  
% 0.51/0.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.63  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.51/0.63  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.51/0.63  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.51/0.63  # Maximum resident set size: 2460 pages
% 0.51/0.63  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------