TSTP Solution File: COL109-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : COL109-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:09:55 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.60s 1.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 9 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_xb,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_z)),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_1458,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,X0),X1),X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X2)),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__3_0) ).
cnf(c_1459,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(X0,X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(X2,X3,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X2),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X1,X3),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/COL002-1.ax',cls_Comb_Oparcontract_Ointros__4_0) ).
cnf(c_29847,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(c_Comb_Ocomb_OS,v_x_H),v_y_Ha),v_w),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(X0,X1),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb,v_z),X0,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_z),X1,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_29884,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_xb,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x_H,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1458,c_29847]) ).
cnf(c_29902,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_xb,v_x_H,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_29884]) ).
cnf(c_29932,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_yb,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y_Ha,v_w),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_29902,c_50,c_49,c_29902]) ).
cnf(c_29934,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_z,v_w,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_yb,v_y_Ha,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Oparcontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1459,c_29932]) ).
cnf(c_29935,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_29934,c_49,c_51]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : COL109-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:19:34 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.60/1.65 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.60/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ iProver source info
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.60/1.65 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.60/1.65 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Parsing...successful
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 823 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 69 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Proving...
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Problem Properties
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 clauses 346
% 7.60/1.65 conjectures 8
% 7.60/1.65 EPR 27
% 7.60/1.65 Horn 305
% 7.60/1.65 unary 89
% 7.60/1.65 binary 195
% 7.60/1.65 lits 693
% 7.60/1.65 lits eq 219
% 7.60/1.65 fd_pure 0
% 7.60/1.65 fd_pseudo 0
% 7.60/1.65 fd_cond 23
% 7.60/1.65 fd_pseudo_cond 42
% 7.60/1.65 AC symbols 0
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------
% 7.60/1.65 Current options:
% 7.60/1.65 ------
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 ------ Proving...
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.60/1.65
% 7.60/1.65
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------