TSTP Solution File: COL102-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : COL102-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_x,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl__trans_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Transitive__Closure_Ortrancl(c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_Comb_Ocomb),tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Transitive__Closure_Or__into__rtrancl_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Pair(v_y,v_za,tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb))
| c_in(c_Pair(c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_y,v_z),c_Comb_Ocomb_Oop_A_D_D(v_za,v_z),tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb),c_Comb_Ocontract,tc_prod(tc_Comb_Ocomb,tc_Comb_Ocomb)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Comb_Ocontract_OAp1_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : COL102-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:31:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.35 % symbols: 13
% 0.20/0.35 % clauses: 6
% 0.20/0.35 % start clauses: 3
% 0.20/0.35 % iterative deepening steps: 44
% 0.20/0.35 % maximum path limit: 3
% 0.20/0.35 % literal attempts: 1200
% 0.20/0.35 % depth failures: 675
% 0.20/0.35 % regularity failures: 5
% 0.20/0.35 % tautology failures: 79
% 0.20/0.35 % reductions: 5
% 0.20/0.35 % extensions: 1072
% 0.20/0.35 % SAT variables: 470
% 0.20/0.35 % SAT clauses: 440
% 0.20/0.35 % WalkSAT solutions: 432
% 0.20/0.35 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.20/0.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.35 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------