TSTP Solution File: COL100-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : COL100-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:48:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.95s 2.13s
% Output   : Refutation 1.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(A,B),C)
    | member(pair(A,B),trancl(C)) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ trans(A)
    | ~ member(pair(B,C),A)
    | ~ member(pair(C,D),A)
    | member(pair(B,D),A) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ diamond(A)
    | ~ member(pair(B,C),trancl(A))
    | ~ member(pair(B,D),A)
    | member(pair(D,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(B,C,D,A)),trancl(A)) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ diamond(A)
    | ~ member(pair(B,C),trancl(A))
    | ~ member(pair(B,D),A)
    | member(pair(C,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(B,C,D,A)),A) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(y,A),trancl(r))
    | member(pair(ya,sk1(A)),trancl(r)) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(y,A),trancl(r))
    | member(pair(A,sk1(A)),trancl(r)) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ member(pair(z,A),trancl(r))
    | ~ member(pair(yp,A),trancl(r)) ),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    trans(trancl(A)),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    diamond(r),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    member(pair(ya,z),r),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    member(pair(y,yp),trancl(r)),
    file('COL100-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(48,plain,
    member(pair(yp,sk1(yp)),trancl(r)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,15]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,15')] ).

cnf(49,plain,
    member(pair(ya,sk1(yp)),trancl(r)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,14]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,14')] ).

cnf(136,plain,
    member(pair(sk1(yp),diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(ya,sk1(yp),z,r)),r),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[49,13,19,21]),
    [iquote('hyper,49,13,19,21')] ).

cnf(137,plain,
    member(pair(z,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(ya,sk1(yp),z,r)),trancl(r)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[49,12,19,21]),
    [iquote('hyper,49,12,19,21')] ).

cnf(2121,plain,
    member(pair(sk1(yp),diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(ya,sk1(yp),z,r)),trancl(r)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[136,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,136,10')] ).

cnf(3949,plain,
    member(pair(yp,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(ya,sk1(yp),z,r)),trancl(r)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[2121,11,18,48]),
    [iquote('hyper,2121,11,18,48')] ).

cnf(3973,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3949,16,137]),
    [iquote('hyper,3949,16,137')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL100-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:30:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.95/2.13  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.95/2.13  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.95/2.13  Wed Jul 27 02:30:33 2022
% 1.95/2.13  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 6377.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.95/2.13  set(auto).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.95/2.13  clear(print_given).
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  list(usable).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] A=A.
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] combK!=combS.
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] combK!=comb_app(P,Q).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] combS!=comb_app(P,Q).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] comb_app(P1,Q1)!=comb_app(P2,Q2)|P1=P2.
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] comb_app(P1,Q1)!=comb_app(P2,Q2)|Q1=Q2.
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] P1!=P2|Q1!=Q2|comb_app(P1,Q1)=comb_app(P2,Q2).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -member(pair(A,B),R)|member(pair(A,B),trancl(R)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] trans(trancl(R)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -trans(R)| -member(pair(A,B),R)| -member(pair(B,C),R)|member(pair(A,C),R).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -diamond(R)| -member(pair(X,Y),trancl(R))| -member(pair(X,YP),R)|member(pair(YP,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X,Y,YP,R)),trancl(R)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -diamond(R)| -member(pair(X,Y),trancl(R))| -member(pair(X,YP),R)|member(pair(Y,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(X,Y,YP,R)),R).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] diamond(r).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] member(pair(y,ya),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] member(pair(ya,z),r).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -member(pair(y,YP),trancl(r))|member(pair(ya,sk1(YP)),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -member(pair(y,YP),trancl(r))|member(pair(YP,sk1(YP)),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] member(pair(y,yp),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  0 [] -member(pair(z,ZA),trancl(r))| -member(pair(yp,ZA),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  end_of_list.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.95/2.13  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.95/2.13  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.95/2.13     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ------------> process usable:
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] combS!=combK.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 4 [copy,3,flip.1] comb_app(A,B)!=combK.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [copy,5,flip.1] comb_app(A,B)!=combS.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 7 [] comb_app(A,B)!=comb_app(C,D)|A=C.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 8 [] comb_app(A,B)!=comb_app(C,D)|B=D.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 9 [] A!=B|C!=D|comb_app(A,C)=comb_app(B,D).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -member(pair(A,B),C)|member(pair(A,B),trancl(C)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 11 [] -trans(A)| -member(pair(B,C),A)| -member(pair(C,D),A)|member(pair(B,D),A).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 12 [] -diamond(A)| -member(pair(B,C),trancl(A))| -member(pair(B,D),A)|member(pair(D,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(B,C,D,A)),trancl(A)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=22): 13 [] -diamond(A)| -member(pair(B,C),trancl(A))| -member(pair(B,D),A)|member(pair(C,diamond_strip_lemmaD_sk1(B,C,D,A)),A).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 14 [] -member(pair(y,A),trancl(r))|member(pair(ya,sk1(A)),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 15 [] -member(pair(y,A),trancl(r))|member(pair(A,sk1(A)),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 16 [] -member(pair(z,A),trancl(r))| -member(pair(yp,A),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ------------> process sos:
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] A=A.
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 18 [] trans(trancl(A)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 19 [] diamond(r).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 20 [] member(pair(y,ya),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] member(pair(ya,z),r).
% 1.95/2.13  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 22 [] member(pair(y,yp),trancl(r)).
% 1.95/2.13    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.18 sec ----> 3973 [hyper,3949,16,137] $F.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.95/2.13  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.95/2.13  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.95/2.13  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ============ end of search ============
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.95/2.13  clauses given                233
% 1.95/2.13  clauses generated           4276
% 1.95/2.13  clauses kept                3969
% 1.95/2.13  clauses forward subsumed     326
% 1.95/2.13  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.95/2.13  Kbytes malloced             3906
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.95/2.13  user CPU time          0.18          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.95/2.13  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.95/2.13  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.95/2.13  
% 1.95/2.13  Process 6377 finished Wed Jul 27 02:30:35 2022
% 1.95/2.13  Otter interrupted
% 1.95/2.13  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------