TSTP Solution File: COL081-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : COL081-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:22:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  13 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   6 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    k: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    projection1: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    projection2: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    abstraction: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    eq: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    n: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    b: $i ).

cnf(abstraction,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL001-0.ax',abstraction) ).

cnf(k_definition,axiom,
    apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL001-0.ax',k_definition) ).

cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/COL001-0.ax',extensionality2) ).

cnf(prove_TRC2c,negated_conjecture,
    k(k(b)) != apply(abstraction,k(k(b))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_TRC2c) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),X2),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),apply(X2,X3)),
    abstraction ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    apply(k(X1),X2) = X1,
    k_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | apply(X1,n(X1,X2)) != apply(X2,n(X1,X2)) ),
    extensionality2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),X1),X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(apply(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( k(X1) = X2
    | apply(X2,n(k(X1),X2)) != X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),X1),k(X2)),X3) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X1),k(X2)),X3) = apply(apply(X1,k(X3)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),X1),k(X2)) = k(X2),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    apply(apply(abstraction,k(k(X1))),X2) = k(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    k(k(b)) != apply(abstraction,k(k(b))),
    prove_TRC2c ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    apply(abstraction,k(k(X1))) = k(k(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : COL081-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 05:04:02 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.63  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.63  % Total time : 0.057000 s
% 0.19/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63  % Total time : 0.060000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------