TSTP Solution File: COL079-1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : COL079-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:48:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 149.63s 149.85s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : COL079-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:14:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.64/1.82 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.64/1.82 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.64/1.82 Wed Jul 27 02:14:55 2022
% 1.64/1.82 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 3316.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.64/1.82 set(auto).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.64/1.82 clear(print_given).
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 list(usable).
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] A=A.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(k(X),Y)=X.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(projection1,pair(X,Y))=X.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(projection2,pair(X,Y))=Y.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] pair(apply(projection1,X),apply(projection2,X))=X.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(pair(X,Y),Z)=pair(apply(X,Z),apply(Y,Z)).
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z)=apply(apply(X,k(Z)),apply(Y,Z)).
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(e_q,pair(X,X))=projection1.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] X=Y|apply(e_q,pair(X,Y))=projection2.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] X=Y|apply(X,n(X,Y))!=apply(Y,n(X,Y)).
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] projection1!=projection2.
% 1.64/1.82 0 [] apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b)))!=apply(abstraction,b).
% 1.64/1.82 end_of_list.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 1.64/1.82 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.64/1.82 deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.64/1.82 clauses in usable.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.64/1.82 dependent: set(factor).
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 ------------> process usable:
% 1.64/1.82 ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 1 [] A=B|apply(A,n(A,B))!=apply(B,n(A,B)).
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [copy,2,flip.1] projection2!=projection1.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 4 [] apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,apply(abstraction,b)))!=apply(abstraction,b).
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83 ------------> process sos:
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 5 [] A=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] apply(k(A),B)=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] apply(k(A),B)=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 8 [] apply(projection1,pair(A,B))=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 9 [new_demod,8] apply(projection1,pair(A,B))=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 10 [] apply(projection2,pair(A,B))=B.
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 11 [new_demod,10] apply(projection2,pair(A,B))=B.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 12 [] pair(apply(projection1,A),apply(projection2,A))=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 13 [new_demod,12] pair(apply(projection1,A),apply(projection2,A))=A.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 15 [copy,14,flip.1] pair(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(pair(A,C),B).
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 16 [new_demod,15] pair(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(pair(A,C),B).
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 17 [] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,k(C)),apply(B,C)).
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 18 [] apply(e_q,pair(A,A))=projection1.
% 1.64/1.83 ---> New Demodulator: 19 [new_demod,18] apply(e_q,pair(A,A))=projection1.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 20 [] A=B|apply(e_q,pair(A,B))=projection2.
% 1.64/1.83 Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,5,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 7.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 9.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 11.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 13.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 16.
% 1.64/1.83 >> back demodulating 12 with 16.
% 1.64/1.83 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 23 [copy,17,flip.1] apply(apply(A,k(B)),apply(C,B))=apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),C),B).
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 19.
% 1.64/1.83 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 22.
% 1.64/1.83 Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,23,flip.1] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,k(C)),apply(B,C)).
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83
% 1.64/1.83 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 sos_size=593
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 sos_size=615
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 sos_size=244
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 ============ end of search ============
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 -------------- statistics -------------
% 149.63/149.85 clauses given 1776
% 149.63/149.85 clauses generated 10249831
% 149.63/149.85 clauses kept 2041
% 149.63/149.85 clauses forward subsumed 428151
% 149.63/149.85 clauses back subsumed 396
% 149.63/149.85 Kbytes malloced 9765
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 149.63/149.85 user CPU time 148.05 (0 hr, 2 min, 28 sec)
% 149.63/149.85 system CPU time 0.02 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 149.63/149.85 wall-clock time 149 (0 hr, 2 min, 29 sec)
% 149.63/149.85
% 149.63/149.85 Process 3316 finished Wed Jul 27 02:17:24 2022
% 149.63/149.85 Otter interrupted
% 149.63/149.85 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------