TSTP Solution File: COL075-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.90s 1.17s
% Output   : Refutation 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL075-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 11:44:41 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.90/1.17  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.90/1.17  Process 23110 was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.90/1.17  Tue May 31 11:44:41 2022
% 0.90/1.17  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_22956_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_22956_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.90/1.17  set(auto2).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.90/1.17      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.90/1.17      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.90/1.17      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.90/1.17  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.90/1.17  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.90/1.17  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.90/1.17  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.90/1.17  clear(print_given).
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (11 formulas)
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.90/1.17  Function symbol KB weights:  projection1=1. projection2=1. eq=1. k=1. abstraction=1. apply=1. pair=1. n=1. b=1. c=1.
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.90/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.90/1.17  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % Proof 1 at 0.20 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.90/1.17  % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.90/1.17  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.90/1.17  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 0.90/1.17  % Given clauses 120.
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  1 apply(apply(k,A),B) = A # label(k_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.90/1.17  9 apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),B),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(k,C)),apply(B,C)) # label(abstraction) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.90/1.17  10 apply(apply(A,apply(k,B)),apply(C,B)) = apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),C),B).  [copy(9),flip(a)].
% 0.90/1.17  13 apply(apply(A,b(A)),c(A)) != apply(b(A),b(A)) # label(prove_diagonal_combinator) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.90/1.17  33 apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),apply(k,B)),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(k,C)),B).  [para(1(a,1),10(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.90/1.17  1491 apply(apply(apply(apply(abstraction,abstraction),k),A),B) = apply(A,A).  [para(10(a,1),33(a,1,1)),rewrite([1(12)])].
% 0.90/1.17  1492 $F.  [resolve(1491,a,13,a)].
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  Given=120. Generated=3743. Kept=1487. proofs=1.
% 0.90/1.17  Usable=99. Sos=1136. Demods=276. Limbo=4, Disabled=258. Hints=0.
% 0.90/1.17  Megabytes=2.42.
% 0.90/1.17  User_CPU=0.20, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.90/1.17  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.90/1.17  
% 0.90/1.17  Process 23110 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 11:44:42 2022
% 0.90/1.17  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------