TSTP Solution File: COL074-3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL074-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.47s 0.63s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  27 unt;   2 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (  32 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(k_definition,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(k,X),Y) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_definition) ).

cnf(pairwise_application,axiom,
    apply(pair(X,Y),Z) = pair(apply(X,Z),apply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pairwise_application) ).

cnf(abstraction,negated_conjecture,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z) = apply(apply(X,apply(k,Z)),apply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstraction) ).

cnf(equality,axiom,
    apply(eq,pair(X,X)) = projection1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equality) ).

cnf(extensionality1,axiom,
    ( X = Y
    | apply(eq,pair(X,Y)) = projection2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality1) ).

cnf(extensionality2,axiom,
    ( X = Y
    | apply(X,n(X,Y)) != apply(Y,n(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',extensionality2) ).

cnf(different_projections,axiom,
    projection1 != projection2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',different_projections) ).

cnf(k_projection2,axiom,
    apply(k,projection2) = k_projection2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k_projection2) ).

cnf(self_referential,axiom,
    s = apply(eq,pair(apply(k,s),apply(k,projection2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',self_referential) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    s = apply(eq,pair(apply(k,s),k_projection2)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[self_referential,k_projection2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    apply(k_projection2,X) = projection2,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[k_definition,k_projection2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ( apply(k,s) = k_projection2
    | s = projection2 ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[14,extensionality1,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    apply(eq,apply(pair(X,X),Y)) = projection1,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[equality,pairwise_application,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    apply(pair(k,X),projection2) = pair(k_projection2,apply(X,projection2)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[pairwise_application,k_projection2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    apply(pair(apply(k,X),Y),Z) = pair(X,apply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[pairwise_application,k_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    apply(pair(k,X),projection2) = apply(pair(apply(k,k_projection2),X),projection2),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[22,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    apply(pair(X,apply(k,Y)),Z) = pair(apply(X,Z),Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[pairwise_application,k_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    s = apply(eq,apply(apply(pair(apply(k,k),k),k_projection2),s)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,28,32,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(54,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(abstraction,k),X),Y) = apply(k,Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[k_definition,abstraction,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    s = projection2,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[k_definition,20,theory(equality)]),17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(99,plain,
    projection2 = apply(eq,apply(apply(pair(apply(k,k),k),k_projection2),projection2)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,98,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(129,plain,
    apply(apply(abstraction,k),X) = k,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[extensionality2,54]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    apply(pair(apply(abstraction,k),X),Y) = pair(k,apply(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[pairwise_application,129,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(131,plain,
    apply(pair(X,apply(abstraction,k)),Y) = pair(apply(X,Y),k),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[pairwise_application,129,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    projection2 = apply(eq,apply(apply(apply(apply(pair(apply(abstraction,k),abstraction),k),k),k_projection2),projection2)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[99,130,131,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(285,plain,
    apply(pair(apply(k,X),k),projection2) = pair(X,k_projection2),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[28,k_projection2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(365,plain,
    apply(pair(k,k),projection2) = pair(k_projection2,k_projection2),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[285,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(379,plain,
    apply(pair(k,apply(k,X)),projection2) = pair(k_projection2,X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[32,k_projection2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(539,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(pair(apply(abstraction,k),abstraction),k),k),X),projection2) = pair(k_projection2,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[379,28,theory(equality)]),130,131,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(540,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[132,different_projections,21,365,539,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : COL074-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Tue May 31 06:26:28 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.39  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.40  * 
% 0.16/0.40  * 
% 0.16/0.40  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.16/0.40  * 
% 0.16/0.40  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.16/0.40  * 
% 0.16/0.40  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.16/0.40   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.16/0.40   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.16/0.40   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.40   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.16/0.40   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.16/0.40   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.16/0.40   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.16/0.40   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.16/0.40   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.16/0.40   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.16/0.41   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.16/0.41   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.16/0.41  * 
% 0.16/0.41  "."
% 0.16/0.41  * 
% 0.16/0.41  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T06:26:28
% 0.16/0.41  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T06:26:28
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  #||
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.63  ||#
% 0.47/0.63  
% 0.47/0.63  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.47/0.63  ;       914 formulas have been input or derived (from 67 formulas).
% 0.47/0.63  ;       540 (59%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.47/0.63  ;          202 (37%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.47/0.63  ;          338 (63%) are still being kept.
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.002   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (13 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.067  30%   Process new row              (877 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.006   3%   Resolution                   (132 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.010   4%   Paramodulation               (66 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (2 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (82 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.002   1%   Forward subsumption          (82 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.001   0%   Backward subsumption         (68 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (93 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.045  20%   Forward simplification       (858 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.025  11%   Backward simplification      (539 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.051  23%   Ordering                     (7,921 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.014   6%   Other
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.223        Total
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.225        Real time
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; Term-hash-array has 2,069 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 61 entries (61 at peak, 68 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 500 nodes (500 at peak, 560 added, 60 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ;  Retrieved 73 possibly forward subsuming rows in 82 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ;  Retrieved 27 possibly backward subsumed rows in 68 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 1,461 entries (1,486 at peak, 2,238 added, 777 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 2,527 nodes (2,552 at peak, 3,065 added, 538 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 1,461 entries (1,486 at peak, 2,238 added, 777 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 9,078 nodes (9,432 at peak, 13,705 added, 4,627 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 6,144 generalization terms in 7,584 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 2,092 instance terms in 874 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 2,755 unifiable terms in 478 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     8 with value 0
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to process has 9 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     4 with value 23              4 with value 25               1 with value 29
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to give has 283 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value (4 17)         10 with value (4 35)          12 with value (4 55)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     6 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 36)           3 with value (4 56)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    13 with value (4 19)          5 with value (4 37)           5 with value (4 57)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    13 with value (4 20)          1 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    28 with value (4 21)          2 with value (4 39)           2 with value (4 60)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    13 with value (4 22)          2 with value (4 40)           2 with value (4 62)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    21 with value (4 23)          2 with value (4 41)           1 with value (4 64)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    15 with value (4 24)         10 with value (4 42)           3 with value (4 65)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    12 with value (4 25)          3 with value (4 43)           8 with value (4 66)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     3 with value (4 26)          2 with value (4 45)           1 with value (4 67)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     8 with value (4 27)          4 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 69)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value (4 28)          2 with value (4 47)           1 with value (4 70)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     7 with value (4 29)          5 with value (4 49)           2 with value (4 71)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     9 with value (4 30)          2 with value (4 50)           2 with value (4 72)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     2 with value (4 31)          2 with value (4 51)           2 with value (4 78)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     5 with value (4 32)          4 with value (4 52)           2 with value (4 79)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     4 with value (4 33)          2 with value (4 53)           4 with value (4 80)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     3 with value (4 34)          4 with value (4 54)           4 with value (4 86)
% 0.47/0.63  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.63    0.226 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.63    0.201289 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.63    0.024373 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.63    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.47/0.63    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.63    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.63    19,025,336 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T06:26:28
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------