TSTP Solution File: COL074-2 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : COL074-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:48:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 299.91s 300.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : COL074-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:20:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.67/1.86 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.67/1.86 The process was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 1.67/1.86 Wed Jul 27 02:20:36 2022
% 1.67/1.86 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 22030.
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.67/1.86 set(auto).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.67/1.86 clear(print_given).
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 list(usable).
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] A=A.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(apply(k,X),Y)=X.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(projection1,pair(X,Y))=X.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(projection2,pair(X,Y))=Y.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] pair(apply(projection1,X),apply(projection2,X))=X.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(pair(X,Y),Z)=pair(apply(X,Z),apply(Y,Z)).
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,X),Y),Z)=apply(apply(X,apply(k,Z)),apply(Y,Z)).
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(e_q,pair(X,X))=projection1.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] X=Y|apply(e_q,pair(X,Y))=projection2.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] X=Y|apply(X,n(X,Y))!=apply(Y,n(X,Y)).
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] projection1!=projection2.
% 1.67/1.86 0 [] apply(apply(f,X),Y)=apply(X,X).
% 1.67/1.86 end_of_list.
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 1.67/1.86 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.67/1.86 deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.67/1.86 clauses in usable.
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.67/1.86 dependent: set(factor).
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 ------------> process usable:
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 1 [] A=B|apply(A,n(A,B))!=apply(B,n(A,B)).
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [copy,2,flip.1] projection2!=projection1.
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 ------------> process sos:
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] A=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 5 [] apply(apply(k,A),B)=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] apply(apply(k,A),B)=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 7 [] apply(projection1,pair(A,B))=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] apply(projection1,pair(A,B))=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 9 [] apply(projection2,pair(A,B))=B.
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] apply(projection2,pair(A,B))=B.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 11 [] pair(apply(projection1,A),apply(projection2,A))=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] pair(apply(projection1,A),apply(projection2,A))=A.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 14 [copy,13,flip.1] pair(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(pair(A,C),B).
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] pair(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(pair(A,C),B).
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 16 [] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,apply(k,C)),apply(B,C)).
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 17 [] apply(e_q,pair(A,A))=projection1.
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 18 [new_demod,17] apply(e_q,pair(A,A))=projection1.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 19 [] A=B|apply(e_q,pair(A,B))=projection2.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 20 [] apply(apply(f,A),B)=apply(A,A).
% 1.67/1.86 ---> New Demodulator: 21 [new_demod,20] apply(apply(f,A),B)=apply(A,A).
% 1.67/1.86 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.67/1.86 >> back demodulating 11 with 15.
% 1.67/1.86 ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 24 [copy,16,flip.1] apply(apply(A,apply(k,B)),apply(C,B))=apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),C),B).
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 18.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 21.
% 1.67/1.86 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 23.
% 1.67/1.86 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,24,flip.1] apply(apply(apply(abstraction,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,apply(k,C)),apply(B,C)).
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.67/1.86
% 1.67/1.86 =========== start of search ==Alarm clock
% 299.91/300.07 Otter interrupted
% 299.91/300.07 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------