TSTP Solution File: COL064-10 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : COL064-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:05:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.72s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (  10   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : apply(apply(t,X0),X1) = apply(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t_definition) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(t,y),apply(z,x)),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f11,f2]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(t,y),apply(apply(t,x),z)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f10,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : apply(apply(apply(b,X0),X1),X2) = apply(X0,apply(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(b,apply(t,y)),apply(t,x)),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f9,f1]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,b),t),y),apply(t,x)),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f8,f2]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(t,apply(t,x)),apply(apply(apply(b,b),t),y)),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f7,f1]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(t,apply(t,x))),apply(apply(b,b),t)),y),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f6,f1]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,b),t),apply(t,x)),apply(apply(b,b),t)),y),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f5,f2]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(apply(t,apply(apply(b,b),t)),apply(apply(apply(b,b),t),apply(t,x))),y),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f4,f1]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    apply(apply(z,x),y) != apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(t,apply(apply(b,b),t))),apply(apply(b,b),t)),apply(t,x)),y),z),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f3,f1]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(t,apply(apply(b,b),t))),apply(apply(b,b),t))),t),x),y),z) != apply(apply(z,x),y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_v_combinator) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : COL064-10 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 13:04:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_PEQ_UEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.93  % (19891)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19890)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19893)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19889)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19894)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Memory used [KB]: 954
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)First to succeed.
% 0.72/0.93  % (19890)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19893)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19892)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Memory used [KB]: 962
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19894)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19891)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19889)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19892)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (19896)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Memory used [KB]: 949
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-19888"
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19896)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.72/0.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.72/0.93  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.72/0.93  
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Memory used [KB]: 962
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.93  % (19895)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.72/0.93  % (19888)Success in time 0.55 s
% 0.72/0.93  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------