TSTP Solution File: COL060-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL060-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ny4qbYn0mY true
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:34:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.99s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14 % Problem : COL060-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ny4qbYn0mY true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:24:09 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.68 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.99/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.99/0.75 % BCE start: 3
% 0.99/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.99/0.75 % PE start: 3
% 0.99/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.99/0.75 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.99/0.75 % done 2 iterations in 0.006s
% 0.99/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.99/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.99/0.75 thf(t_type, type, t: $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(z_type, type, z: $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(prove_q_combinator, conjecture,
% 0.99/0.75 (( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @ b @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ ( apply @ t @ b ) ) @ b ) ) @
% 0.99/0.75 t ) @
% 0.99/0.75 x ) @
% 0.99/0.75 y ) @
% 0.99/0.75 z ) =
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @ y @ ( apply @ x @ z ) ))).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.99/0.75 (( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @ b @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ ( apply @ t @ b ) ) @ b ) ) @
% 0.99/0.75 t ) @
% 0.99/0.75 x ) @
% 0.99/0.75 y ) @
% 0.99/0.75 z ) !=
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @ y @ ( apply @ x @ z ) )),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_q_combinator])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (((apply @
% 0.99/0.75 (apply @
% 0.99/0.75 (apply @
% 0.99/0.75 (apply @
% 0.99/0.75 (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ t @ b)) @ b)) @ t) @
% 0.99/0.75 x) @
% 0.99/0.75 y) @
% 0.99/0.75 z) != (apply @ y @ (apply @ x @ z)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 0.99/0.75 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 0.99/0.75 ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.99/0.75 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.99/0.75 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(t_definition, axiom,
% 0.99/0.75 (( apply @ ( apply @ t @ X ) @ Y ) = ( apply @ Y @ X ))).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ t @ X1) @ X0) = (apply @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [t_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.99/0.75 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ t @ X1) @ X0) = (apply @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [t_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.99/0.75 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 0.99/0.75 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.99/0.75 (((apply @ y @ (apply @ x @ z)) != (apply @ y @ (apply @ x @ z)))),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.99/0.75 [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0,
% 0.99/0.75 zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1,
% 0.99/0.75 zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.99/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ($false),
% 0.99/0.75 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3])).
% 0.99/0.75
% 0.99/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.99/0.75
% 0.99/0.75
% 0.99/0.75 % Terminating...
% 0.99/0.79 % Runner terminated.
% 1.41/0.80 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------