%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : COL058-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:31:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : COL058-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:54:02 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.38  Command-line arguments: --ground-connectedness --complete-subsets
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.38  Axiom 1 (lark_exists): response(response(lark, X), Y) = response(X, response(Y, Y)).
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  Goal 1 (prove_the_bird_exists): response(X, X) = X.
% 0.20/0.38  The goal is true when:
% 0.20/0.38    X = response(response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))))
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  Proof:
% 0.20/0.38    response(response(response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark)))), response(response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark)))))
% 0.20/0.38  = { by axiom 1 (lark_exists) R->L }
% 0.20/0.38    response(response(lark, response(response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))))
% 0.20/0.38  = { by axiom 1 (lark_exists) R->L }
% 0.20/0.38    response(response(response(lark, lark), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark)))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))))
% 0.20/0.38  = { by axiom 1 (lark_exists) R->L }
% 0.20/0.38    response(response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))), response(response(lark, response(lark, lark)), response(lark, response(lark, lark))))
% 0.20/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.38  
% 0.20/0.38  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------