TSTP Solution File: COL057-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : COL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:31:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:57:35 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.42
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.43 Axiom 1 (i_definition): apply(i, X) = X.
% 0.19/0.43 Axiom 2 (s_definition): apply(apply(apply(s, X), Y), Z) = apply(apply(X, Z), apply(Y, Z)).
% 0.19/0.43 Axiom 3 (b_definition): apply(apply(apply(b, X), Y), Z) = apply(X, apply(Y, Z)).
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Goal 1 (prove_strong_fixed_point): apply(X, f(X)) = apply(f(X), apply(X, f(X))).
% 0.19/0.43 The goal is true when:
% 0.19/0.43 X = apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Proof:
% 0.19/0.43 apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))))
% 0.19/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 0.19/0.43 apply(apply(apply(apply(b, apply(s, i)), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)), apply(i, apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))))
% 0.19/0.43 = { by axiom 3 (b_definition) }
% 0.19/0.43 apply(apply(apply(s, i), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(i, apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)))), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))))
% 0.19/0.43 = { by axiom 1 (i_definition) }
% 0.19/0.43 apply(apply(apply(s, i), apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))))
% 0.19/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (s_definition) }
% 0.19/0.43 apply(apply(i, f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)))), apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)))))
% 0.19/0.43 = { by axiom 1 (i_definition) }
% 0.19/0.43 apply(f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i))), apply(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)), f(apply(apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i), apply(apply(s, apply(b, apply(s, i))), i)))))
% 0.19/0.43 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------