TSTP Solution File: COL057-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : COL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : COL057-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 09:40:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35  Tue May 31 09:40:10 2022
% 0.19/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11222.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.19/0.35  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [copy,9,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 0.19/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.19/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 10
% 0.19/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 42
% 0.19/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.19/0.38     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.38     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.10 sec ----> 921 [binary,920.1,275.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  1 [] {-} apply(A,f(A))!=apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))).
% 0.19/0.47  2 [copy,1,flip.1] {+} apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A)))!=apply(A,f(A)).
% 0.19/0.47  3 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 0.19/0.47  4 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C)=apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.19/0.47  6 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 0.19/0.47  7 [] {+} apply(i,A)=A.
% 0.19/0.47  10 [copy,3,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(apply(apply(s,A),C),B).
% 0.19/0.47  12 [para_from,3.1.1,2.1.1.2] {-} apply(f(apply(apply(s,A),B)),apply(apply(A,f(apply(apply(s,A),B))),apply(B,f(apply(apply(s,A),B)))))!=apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),f(apply(apply(s,A),B))).
% 0.19/0.47  17 [para_into,10.1.1.1,7.1.1] {-} apply(A,apply(B,A))=apply(apply(apply(s,i),B),A).
% 0.19/0.47  18 [para_into,10.1.1.1,6.1.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(A,B),C),apply(D,B))=apply(apply(apply(s,apply(apply(c,A),C)),D),B).
% 0.19/0.47  203 [para_into,17.1.1.2,7.1.1] {-} apply(A,A)=apply(apply(apply(s,i),i),A).
% 0.19/0.47  275 [para_from,203.1.1,12.1.1.2] {+} apply(f(apply(apply(s,A),A)),apply(apply(apply(s,i),i),apply(A,f(apply(apply(s,A),A)))))!=apply(apply(apply(s,A),A),f(apply(apply(s,A),A))).
% 0.19/0.47  920 [para_into,18.1.1,4.1.1] {-} apply(A,apply(B,apply(C,A)))=apply(apply(apply(s,apply(apply(c,b),B)),C),A).
% 0.19/0.47  921 [binary,920.1,275.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.47  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.48  true clauses given           5      (16.1%)
% 0.19/0.48  false clauses given         26
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.48    11  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    12  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    13  22        6
% 0.19/0.48    15  65        14
% 0.19/0.48    16  2         0
% 0.19/0.48    17  94        11
% 0.19/0.48    19  96        9
% 0.19/0.48    21  62        1
% 0.19/0.48    23  23        0
% 0.19/0.48    24  1         2
% 0.19/0.48    25  10        2
% 0.19/0.48    26  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    27  16        0
% 0.19/0.48    28  1         0
% 0.19/0.48    29  26        0
% 0.19/0.48    30  1         4
% 0.19/0.48    31  18        0
% 0.19/0.48    32  10        3
% 0.19/0.48    33  23        0
% 0.19/0.48    34  9         2
% 0.19/0.48    35  16        0
% 0.19/0.48    36  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    37  8         0
% 0.19/0.48    38  3         3
% 0.19/0.48    39  9         0
% 0.19/0.48    40  6         3
% 0.19/0.48    41  15        0
% 0.19/0.48    42  5         0
% 0.19/0.48    43  2         0
% 0.19/0.48    44  2         2
% 0.19/0.48    45  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    46  3         0
% 0.19/0.48    47  4         0
% 0.19/0.48    48  2         2
% 0.19/0.48    49  3         0
% 0.19/0.48    50  2         0
% 0.19/0.48    51  8         0
% 0.19/0.48    53  1         0
% 0.19/0.48    55  4         0
% 0.19/0.48    56  0         1
% 0.19/0.48    57  9         0
% 0.19/0.48    58  1         0
% 0.19/0.48    59  6         0
% 0.19/0.48  tot:  588       70      (10.6% true)
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  Process 11222 finished Tue May 31 09:40:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------