TSTP Solution File: COL049-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : COL049-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VEtUiZqr9P true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:34:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 15.26s 2.84s
% Output : Refutation 15.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : COL049-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VEtUiZqr9P true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:16:26 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 15.26/2.84 % Solved by fo/fo1_av.sh.
% 15.26/2.84 % done 381 iterations in 2.063s
% 15.26/2.84 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 15.26/2.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 15.26/2.84 thf(w_type, type, w: $i).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(m_type, type, m: $i).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(apply_type, type, apply: $i > $i > $i).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(m_definition, axiom, (( apply @ m @ X ) = ( apply @ X @ X ))).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i]: ((apply @ m @ X0) = (apply @ X0 @ X0))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [m_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(w_definition, axiom,
% 15.26/2.84 (( apply @ ( apply @ w @ X ) @ Y ) = ( apply @ ( apply @ X @ Y ) @ Y ))).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ w @ X0) @ X1) = (apply @ (apply @ X0 @ X1) @ X1))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [w_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(b_definition, axiom,
% 15.26/2.84 (( apply @ ( apply @ ( apply @ b @ X ) @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 15.26/2.84 ( apply @ X @ ( apply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ w @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ X0)
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl225, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ w @ (apply @ b @ X1)) @ X0)
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X1 @ (apply @ m @ X0)))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl24])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i]: ((apply @ m @ X0) = (apply @ X0 @ X0))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [m_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl373, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ m @ (apply @ w @ (apply @ b @ X0)))
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ m @ (apply @ w @ (apply @ b @ X0)))))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl225, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X0) @ X1) @ X2)
% 15.26/2.84 = (apply @ X0 @ (apply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_definition])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(prove_strong_fixed_point, conjecture,
% 15.26/2.84 (( apply @ Y @ ( f @ Y ) ) =
% 15.26/2.84 ( apply @ ( f @ Y ) @ ( apply @ Y @ ( f @ Y ) ) ))).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 15.26/2.84 (( apply @ Y @ ( f @ Y ) ) !=
% 15.26/2.84 ( apply @ ( f @ Y ) @ ( apply @ Y @ ( f @ Y ) ) )),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_strong_fixed_point])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ X0 @ (f @ X0))
% 15.26/2.84 != (apply @ (f @ X0) @ (apply @ X0 @ (f @ X0))))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ X1 @ (apply @ X0 @ (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X1) @ X0))))
% 15.26/2.84 != (apply @ (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X1) @ X0)) @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X1 @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X0 @ (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X1) @ X0))))))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 15.26/2.84 ((apply @ X2 @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X1 @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X0 @
% 15.26/2.84 (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X2) @ X1)) @ X0)))))
% 15.26/2.84 != (apply @
% 15.26/2.84 (f @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X2) @ X1)) @ X0)) @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X2 @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X1 @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ X0 @
% 15.26/2.84 (f @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ X2) @ X1)) @ X0)))))))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl6361, plain,
% 15.26/2.84 (((apply @ m @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ w @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ b @
% 15.26/2.84 (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ m) @ w)) @ b)))))
% 15.26/2.84 != (apply @ m @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ w @
% 15.26/2.84 (apply @ b @
% 15.26/2.84 (f @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ (apply @ (apply @ b @ m) @ w)) @ b))))))),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl373, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 15.26/2.84 thf(zip_derived_cl6449, plain, ($false),
% 15.26/2.84 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6361])).
% 15.26/2.84
% 15.26/2.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 15.26/2.84
% 15.26/2.84
% 15.26/2.84 % Terminating...
% 16.15/2.95 % Runner terminated.
% 16.15/2.96 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------