TSTP Solution File: COL044-7 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL044-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.82s 1.12s
% Output   : Refutation 0.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COL044-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 07:10:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.82/1.12  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.82/1.12  Process 26731 was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.82/1.12  Tue May 31 07:10:26 2022
% 0.82/1.12  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_26507_n017.cluster.edu".
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_26507_n017.cluster.edu
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.82/1.12  set(auto2).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.82/1.12      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.82/1.12      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.82/1.12      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.82/1.12  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.82/1.12  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.82/1.12  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.82/1.12  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.82/1.12  clear(print_given).
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Auto_denials:
% 0.82/1.12    % copying label prove_strong_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.82/1.12  Function symbol KB weights:  b=1. n=1. strong_fixed_point=1. fixed_pt=1. apply=1.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % Proof 1 at 0.14 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_strong_fixed_point.
% 0.82/1.12  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.82/1.12  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.82/1.12  % Maximum clause weight is 49.000.
% 0.82/1.12  % Given clauses 34.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  1 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  2 apply(apply(apply(n,A),B),C) = apply(apply(apply(A,C),B),C) # label(n_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  3 strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b,apply(apply(b,apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n))),n)),b)),b) # label(strong_fixed_point) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  4 apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(strong_fixed_point,fixed_pt)) # label(prove_strong_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [assumption].
% 0.82/1.12  5 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) != apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [copy(4),rewrite([3(1),1(27),1(25),3(25),1(51),1(49)]),flip(a)].
% 0.82/1.12  10 apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,A)),B),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(C,B)),C).  [para(1(a,1),2(a,2,1))].
% 0.82/1.12  12 apply(apply(apply(apply(A,B),C),B),C) = apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,A)),B),C).  [para(2(a,1),2(a,2,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.82/1.12  16 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(apply(n,apply(apply(b,b),apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [para(2(a,1),5(a,1,2)),rewrite([1(20),1(26)])].
% 0.82/1.12  38 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [para(2(a,1),16(a,2)),rewrite([1(44),1(50)])].
% 0.82/1.12  96 apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A))),B),C) = apply(A,apply(apply(C,B),C)).  [para(10(a,2),1(a,1))].
% 0.82/1.12  432 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,b))),n),apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [para(12(a,2),38(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([1(12),1(18)])].
% 0.82/1.12  770 apply(fixed_pt,apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))))) != apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))),apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,fixed_pt)))) # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [para(12(a,2),432(a,2,1)),rewrite([1(36),1(42)])].
% 0.82/1.12  771 $F # answer(prove_strong_fixed_point).  [resolve(770,a,96,a(flip))].
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Given=34. Generated=2121. Kept=769. proofs=1.
% 0.82/1.12  Usable=33. Sos=686. Demods=163. Limbo=1, Disabled=52. Hints=0.
% 0.82/1.12  Megabytes=1.25.
% 0.82/1.12  User_CPU=0.14, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.82/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.82/1.12  
% 0.82/1.12  Process 26731 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 07:10:26 2022
% 0.82/1.12  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------