TSTP Solution File: COL044-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL044-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.29s 1.59s
% Output   : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : COL044-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 10:18:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 1.29/1.59  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 1.29/1.59  Process 26283 was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.29/1.59  Tue May 31 10:18:36 2022
% 1.29/1.59  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_26130_n028.cluster.edu".
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_26130_n028.cluster.edu
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.29/1.59  set(auto2).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 1.29/1.59      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 1.29/1.59      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 1.29/1.59      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 1.29/1.59  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 1.29/1.59  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 1.29/1.59  assign(order,kbo).
% 1.29/1.59  set(lex_order_vars).
% 1.29/1.59  clear(print_given).
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (3 formulas)
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  Auto_denials:
% 1.29/1.59    % copying label prove_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % Assigning unary symbol f kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (5).
% 1.29/1.59  Function symbol KB weights:  b=1. n=1. apply=1. f=0.
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.29/1.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.29/1.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % Proof 1 at 0.59 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_fixed_point.
% 1.29/1.59  % Length of proof is 11.
% 1.29/1.59  % Level of proof is 4.
% 1.29/1.59  % Maximum clause weight is 69.000.
% 1.29/1.59  % Given clauses 54.
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  1 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.29/1.59  2 apply(apply(apply(n,A),B),C) = apply(apply(apply(A,C),B),C) # label(n_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 1.29/1.59  3 apply(A,f(A)) != apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) # label(prove_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [assumption].
% 1.29/1.59  4 apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) != apply(A,f(A)) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [copy(3),flip(a)].
% 1.29/1.59  7 apply(apply(apply(n,b),A),B) = apply(B,apply(A,B)).  [para(2(a,2),1(a,1))].
% 1.29/1.59  9 apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,A)),B),C) = apply(apply(A,apply(C,B)),C).  [para(1(a,1),2(a,2,1))].
% 1.29/1.59  17 apply(f(apply(apply(n,A),B)),apply(apply(apply(n,A),B),f(apply(apply(n,A),B)))) != apply(apply(apply(A,f(apply(apply(n,A),B))),B),f(apply(apply(n,A),B))) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(2(a,1),4(a,2))].
% 1.29/1.59  139 apply(apply(apply(n,b),apply(apply(A,B),C)),B) = apply(B,apply(apply(apply(n,A),C),B)).  [para(2(a,2),7(a,2,2))].
% 1.29/1.59  237 apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A))),B),C) = apply(A,apply(apply(C,B),C)).  [para(9(a,2),1(a,1))].
% 1.29/1.59  2702 apply(f(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A)))),B)),apply(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A)))),B),f(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A)))),B)))) != apply(apply(A,apply(apply(B,f(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A)))),B))),B)),f(apply(apply(n,apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A)))),B))) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(237(a,1),17(a,2,1))].
% 1.29/1.59  2703 $F # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [resolve(2702,a,139,a(flip))].
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  Given=54. Generated=5856. Kept=2701. proofs=1.
% 1.29/1.59  Usable=53. Sos=2492. Demods=386. Limbo=62, Disabled=96. Hints=0.
% 1.29/1.59  Megabytes=5.71.
% 1.29/1.59  User_CPU=0.59, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  THEOREM PROVED
% 1.29/1.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.29/1.59  
% 1.29/1.59  Process 26283 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 10:18:37 2022
% 1.29/1.59  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------