TSTP Solution File: COL042-5 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : COL042-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:41:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 40.68s 40.85s
% Output   : Refutation 40.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (  13 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),Z) = apply(X,apply(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).

cnf(w1_definition,axiom,
    apply(apply(w1,X),Y) = apply(apply(Y,X),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w1_definition) ).

cnf(strong_fixed_point,axiom,
    ( apply(X,fixed_pt) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(X,fixed_pt))
    | fixed_point(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
    ~ fixed_point(apply(apply(b,apply(w1,w1)),apply(apply(b,apply(b,w1)),apply(apply(b,b),b)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    apply(apply(w1,X),apply(apply(b,Y),Z)) = apply(apply(Y,apply(Z,X)),X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[w1_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X),apply(apply(b,Y),Z)),U) = apply(X,apply(Y,apply(Z,U))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),apply(Z,U)) = apply(X,apply(apply(apply(b,Y),Z),U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,b),X),Y),Z),U) = apply(apply(X,Y),apply(Z,U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(20,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(b,apply(b,X)),Y),Z),U) = apply(X,apply(apply(Y,Z),U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( apply(X,apply(Y,fixed_pt)) != apply(fixed_pt,apply(X,apply(Y,fixed_pt)))
    | fixed_point(apply(apply(b,X),Y)) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[strong_fixed_point,b_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,plain,
    apply(apply(w1,X),apply(apply(b,w1),Y)) = apply(apply(X,apply(Y,X)),apply(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[w1_definition,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(745,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),apply(Z,U)) = apply(apply(apply(b,X),apply(apply(b,Y),Z)),U),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[b_definition,14,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2867,plain,
    apply(apply(apply(apply(apply(b,b),w1),X),apply(b,w1)),Y) = apply(apply(X,apply(Y,X)),apply(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[122,19,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3204,plain,
    apply(apply(w1,apply(X,Y)),apply(apply(b,apply(b,Z)),Y)) = apply(Z,apply(apply(w1,Y),apply(apply(b,w1),X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[20,122,theory(equality)]),w1_definition,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6839,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[21,prove_strong_fixed_point]),2867,3204,b_definition,15,745,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : COL042-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:31:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T08:31:47
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-05-31T08:31:47
% 40.68/40.85  
% 40.68/40.85  
% 40.68/40.85  #||
% 40.68/40.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 40.68/40.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 40.68/40.87  ||#
% 40.68/40.87  
% 40.68/40.87  ; Summary of computation:
% 40.68/40.87  ;     15650 formulas have been input or derived (from 70 formulas).
% 40.68/40.87  ;      6839 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 40.68/40.87  ;          551 ( 8%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 40.68/40.87  ;         6288 (92%) are still being kept.
% 40.68/40.87  ; 
% 40.68/40.87  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (4 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     1.114   3%   Process new row              (15,551 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.030   0%   Resolution                   (138 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.471   1%   Paramodulation               (69 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.009   0%   Condensing                   (512 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.083   0%   Forward subsumption          (512 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.014   0%   Backward subsumption         (235 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.004   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (886 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    10.027  25%   Forward simplification       (15,540 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     3.522   9%   Backward simplification      (6,839 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    25.007  62%   Ordering                     (2,369,023 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 40.68/40.87  ;     0.107   0%   Other
% 40.68/40.87  ;    40.390        Total
% 40.68/40.87  ;    40.411        Real time
% 40.68/40.87  ; 
% 40.68/40.87  ; Term-hash-array has 24,184 terms in all.
% 40.68/40.87  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 221 entries (221 at peak, 235 added, 14 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,097 nodes (3,097 at peak, 3,284 added, 187 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ;  Retrieved 933 possibly forward subsuming rows in 512 calls.
% 40.68/40.87  ;  Retrieved 149 possibly backward subsumed rows in 235 calls.
% 40.68/40.87  ; Path-index has 22,610 entries (22,610 at peak, 24,494 added, 1,884 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ; Path-index has 2,213 nodes (2,213 at peak, 2,325 added, 112 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ; Trie-index has 22,610 entries (22,610 at peak, 24,494 added, 1,884 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ; Trie-index has 131,145 nodes (131,145 at peak, 142,568 added, 11,423 deleted).
% 40.68/40.87  ; Retrieved 4,582,693 generalization terms in 250,870 calls.
% 40.68/40.87  ; Retrieved 1,390,330 instance terms in 18,869 calls.
% 40.68/40.87  ; Retrieved 311,564 unifiable terms in 744 calls.
% 40.68/40.87  ; 
% 40.68/40.87  ; The agenda of rows to process has 62 entries:
% 40.68/40.87  ;    11 with value 46             11 with value 50               2 with value 54
% 40.68/40.87  ;     6 with value 47              1 with value 51               1 with value 55
% 40.68/40.87  ;     5 with value 48              3 with value 52               1 with value 56
% 40.68/40.87  ;    16 with value 49              4 with value 53               1 with value 57
% 40.68/40.87  ; The agenda of rows to give has 6220 entries:
% 40.68/40.87  ;    17 with value (4 27)        351 with value (4 43)           8 with value (4 58)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    25 with value (4 28)        276 with value (4 44)           8 with value (4 59)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    55 with value (4 29)        293 with value (4 45)           7 with value (4 60)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    48 with value (4 30)        236 with value (4 46)           6 with value (4 61)
% 40.68/40.87  ;    94 with value (4 31)        123 with value (4 47)           9 with value (4 62)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   116 with value (4 32)        115 with value (4 48)           6 with value (4 63)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   179 with value (4 33)        106 with value (4 49)           3 with value (4 64)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   181 with value (4 34)         62 with value (4 50)           2 with value (4 65)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   287 with value (4 35)         65 with value (4 51)           5 with value (4 66)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   373 with value (4 36)         49 with value (4 52)           1 with value (4 67)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   331 with value (4 37)         31 with value (4 53)           1 with value (4 68)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   417 with value (4 38)         33 with value (4 54)           2 with value (4 69)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   525 with value (4 39)         23 with value (4 55)           3 with value (4 70)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   697 with value (4 40)         28 with value (4 56)           2 with value (4 72)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   558 with value (4 41)         22 with value (4 57)           1 with value (4 73)
% 40.68/40.87  ;   440 with value (4 42)
% 40.68/40.87  Evaluation took:
% 40.68/40.87    40.413 seconds of real time
% 40.68/40.87    37.510258 seconds of user run time
% 40.68/40.87    2.905148 seconds of system run time
% 40.68/40.87    [Run times include 3.834 seconds GC run time.]
% 40.68/40.87    0 calls to %EVAL
% 40.68/40.87    0 page faults and
% 40.68/40.87    2,772,004,544 bytes consed.
% 40.68/40.87  :PROOF-FOUND
% 40.68/40.87  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-05-31T08:32:28
% 40.68/40.87  :PROOF-FOUND
% 40.68/40.87  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------