TSTP Solution File: COL041-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : COL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:39:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.68s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : COL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:26:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.68/0.99  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.68/0.99  Process 5449 was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.68/0.99  Tue May 31 08:26:08 2022
% 0.68/0.99  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_5296_n022.cluster.edu".
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_5296_n022.cluster.edu
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.68/0.99  set(auto2).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.68/0.99      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.68/0.99      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.68/0.99      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.68/0.99  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.68/0.99  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.68/0.99  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.68/0.99  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.68/0.99  clear(print_given).
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  Auto_denials:
% 0.68/0.99    % copying label prove_fixed_point to answer in negative clause
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % Assigning unary symbol f kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (6).
% 0.68/0.99  Function symbol KB weights:  b=1. c=1. m=1. apply=1. f=0.
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.68/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: prove_fixed_point.
% 0.68/0.99  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.68/0.99  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.68/0.99  % Maximum clause weight is 44.000.
% 0.68/0.99  % Given clauses 6.
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  1 apply(m,A) = apply(A,A) # label(m_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99  2 apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)) # label(b_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99  3 apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C) = apply(apply(A,C),B) # label(c_definition) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99  4 apply(A,f(A)) != apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) # label(prove_fixed_point) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [assumption].
% 0.68/0.99  5 apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) != apply(A,f(A)) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [copy(4),flip(a)].
% 0.68/0.99  6 apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(b,A),B))) = apply(m,apply(apply(b,A),B)).  [para(2(a,1),1(a,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.68/0.99  12 apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),B)),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))) != apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B)))) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(2(a,1),5(a,1,2)),rewrite([2(19)])].
% 0.68/0.99  27 apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(c,B),C))),apply(A,apply(apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(c,B),C)))),C))) != apply(A,apply(apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),apply(apply(c,B),C)))),C)) # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [para(3(a,1),12(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([3(29)])].
% 0.68/0.99  28 $F # answer(prove_fixed_point).  [resolve(27,a,6,a)].
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  Given=6. Generated=86. Kept=26. proofs=1.
% 0.68/0.99  Usable=6. Sos=16. Demods=15. Limbo=3, Disabled=4. Hints=0.
% 0.68/0.99  Megabytes=0.08.
% 0.68/0.99  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.68/0.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.68/0.99  
% 0.68/0.99  Process 5449 exit (max_proofs) Tue May 31 08:26:08 2022
% 0.68/0.99  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------