TSTP Solution File: COL041-1 by EQP---0.9e

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : EQP---0.9e
% Problem  : COL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_eqp %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:23:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 1.08s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,plain,
    equal(apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C),apply(A,apply(B,C))),
    file('COL041-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,plain,
    equal(apply(m,A),apply(A,A)),
    file('COL041-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,plain,
    equal(apply(A,A),apply(m,A)),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2]),
    [iquote('flip(2)')] ).

cnf(4,plain,
    equal(apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C),apply(apply(A,C),B)),
    file('COL041-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    equal(apply(apply(A,B),C),apply(apply(apply(c,A),C),B)),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4]),
    [iquote('flip(4)')] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ~ equal(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))),apply(A,f(A))),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1]),
    [iquote('flip(1)')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    equal(apply(apply(apply(apply(c,b),A),B),C),apply(B,apply(A,C))),
    inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,1]),
    [iquote('para(5,1)')] ).

cnf(47,plain,
    ~ equal(apply(f(apply(apply(b,A),B)),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))),apply(A,apply(B,f(apply(apply(b,A),B))))),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,6]),1]),
    [iquote('para(1,6),demod([1])')] ).

cnf(57,plain,
    equal(apply(A,apply(B,apply(apply(apply(c,b),B),A))),apply(m,apply(apply(apply(c,b),B),A))),
    inference(para,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24,3]),
    [iquote('para(24,3)')] ).

cnf(58,plain,
    $false,
    inference(conflict,[status(thm)],[57,47]),
    [iquote('conflict(57,47)')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : COL041-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_eqp %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 31 08:24:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/1.08  ----- EQP 0.9e, May 2009 -----
% 0.43/1.08  The job began on n022.cluster.edu, Tue May 31 08:24:53 2022
% 0.43/1.08  The command was "./eqp09e".
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/1.08  set(lrpo).
% 0.43/1.08  set(basic_paramod).
% 0.43/1.08  set(functional_subsume).
% 0.43/1.08  set(ordered_paramod).
% 0.43/1.08  set(prime_paramod).
% 0.43/1.08  set(para_pairs).
% 0.43/1.08  assign(pick_given_ratio,4).
% 0.43/1.08  clear(print_kept).
% 0.43/1.08  clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.43/1.08  clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.43/1.08  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/1.08  assign(max_mem,64000).
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_commands.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Usable:
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Sos:
% 0.43/1.08  0 (wt=-1) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.43/1.08  0 (wt=-1) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.43/1.08  0 (wt=-1) [] apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C) = apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 0.43/1.08  0 (wt=-1) [] -(apply(A,f(A)) = apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A)))).
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Demodulators:
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Passive:
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Starting to process input.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.43/1.08  1 is a new demodulator.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 2 (wt=7) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 3 (wt=7) [flip(2)] apply(A,A) = apply(m,A).
% 0.43/1.08  clause forward subsumed: 0 (wt=7) [flip(3)] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 4 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C) = apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 5 (wt=13) [flip(4)] apply(apply(A,B),C) = apply(apply(apply(c,A),C),B).
% 0.43/1.08  clause forward subsumed: 0 (wt=13) [flip(5)] apply(apply(apply(c,A),C),B) = apply(apply(A,B),C).
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ** KEPT: 6 (wt=12) [flip(1)] -(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) = apply(A,f(A))).
% 0.43/1.08  ---------------- PROOF FOUND ----------------
% 0.43/1.08  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  After processing input:
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Usable:
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Sos:
% 0.43/1.08  2 (wt=7) [] apply(m,A) = apply(A,A).
% 0.43/1.08  3 (wt=7) [flip(2)] apply(A,A) = apply(m,A).
% 0.43/1.08  6 (wt=12) [flip(1)] -(apply(f(A),apply(A,f(A))) = apply(A,f(A))).
% 0.43/1.08  1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.43/1.08  4 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C) = apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 0.43/1.08  5 (wt=13) [flip(4)] apply(apply(A,B),C) = apply(apply(apply(c,A),C),B).
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Demodulators:
% 0.43/1.08  1 (wt=13) [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C) = apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  Passive:
% 0.43/1.08  end_of_list.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  UNIT CONFLICT from 57 and 47 at   0.00 seconds.
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.43/1.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.43/1.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  
% 0.43/1.08  ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.43/1.08  Memory dynamically allocated (tp_alloc): 488.
% 0.43/1.08    type (bytes each)        gets      frees     in use      avail      bytes
% 0.43/1.08  sym_ent (  96)               56          0         56          0      5.2 K
% 0.43/1.09  term (  16)                2612       1705        907         29     18.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  gen_ptr (   8)             3542        237       3305          9     25.9 K
% 0.43/1.09  context ( 808)             2024       2022          2          3      3.9 K
% 0.43/1.09  trail (  12)                 63         63          0          4      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  bt_node (  68)              571        568          3          4      0.5 K
% 0.43/1.09  ac_position (285432)          0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  ac_match_pos (14044)          0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  ac_match_free_vars_pos (4020)
% 0.43/1.09                                0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  discrim (  12)              738         10        728          0      8.5 K
% 0.43/1.09  flat (  40)                4677       4677          0         19      0.7 K
% 0.43/1.09  discrim_pos (  12)           41         41          0          1      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  fpa_head (  12)             371          0        371          0      4.3 K
% 0.43/1.09  fpa_tree (  28)             176        176          0         17      0.5 K
% 0.43/1.09  fpa_pos (  36)               80         80          0          1      0.0 K
% 0.43/1.09  literal (  12)              178        121         57          1      0.7 K
% 0.43/1.09  clause (  24)               178        121         57          1      1.4 K
% 0.43/1.09  list (  12)                  82         26         56          3      0.7 K
% 0.43/1.09  list_pos (  20)             197          9        188          0      3.7 K
% 0.43/1.09  pair_index (   40)              2          0          2          0      0.1 K
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  -------------- statistics -------------
% 0.43/1.09  Clauses input                  4
% 0.43/1.09    Usable input                   0
% 0.43/1.09    Sos input                      4
% 0.43/1.09    Demodulators input             0
% 0.43/1.09    Passive input                  0
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  Processed BS (before search)   8
% 0.43/1.09  Forward subsumed BS            2
% 0.43/1.09  Kept BS                        6
% 0.43/1.09  New demodulators BS            1
% 0.43/1.09  Back demodulated BS            0
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  Clauses or pairs given        58
% 0.43/1.09  Clauses generated             90
% 0.43/1.09  Forward subsumed              39
% 0.43/1.09  Deleted by weight              0
% 0.43/1.09  Deleted by variable count      0
% 0.43/1.09  Kept                          51
% 0.43/1.09  New demodulators              22
% 0.43/1.09  Back demodulated               1
% 0.43/1.09  Ordered paramod prunes         0
% 0.43/1.09  Basic paramod prunes          64
% 0.43/1.09  Prime paramod prunes           0
% 0.43/1.09  Semantic prunes                0
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  Rewrite attmepts            1137
% 0.43/1.09  Rewrites                      18
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  FPA overloads                  0
% 0.43/1.09  FPA underloads                 0
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  Usable size                    0
% 0.43/1.09  Sos size                      55
% 0.43/1.09  Demodulators size             22
% 0.43/1.09  Passive size                   0
% 0.43/1.09  Disabled size                  1
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  Proofs found                   1
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  ----------- times (seconds) ----------- Tue May 31 08:24:53 2022
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  user CPU time             0.00   (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.43/1.09  system CPU time           0.00   (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.43/1.09  wall-clock time           0      (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 0.43/1.09  input time                0.00
% 0.43/1.09  paramodulation time       0.00
% 0.43/1.09  demodulation time         0.00
% 0.43/1.09  orient time               0.00
% 0.43/1.09  weigh time                0.00
% 0.43/1.09  forward subsume time      0.00
% 0.43/1.09  back demod find time      0.00
% 0.43/1.09  conflict time             0.00
% 0.43/1.09  LRPO time                 0.00
% 0.43/1.09  store clause time         0.00
% 0.43/1.09  disable clause time       0.00
% 0.43/1.09  prime paramod time        0.00
% 0.43/1.09  semantics time            0.00
% 0.43/1.09  
% 0.43/1.09  EQP interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------