TSTP Solution File: COL026-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : COL026-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:34:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.30s 2.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  11 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   11 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ apply > #nlpp > w1 > combinator > b

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(w1,type,
    w1: $i ).

tff(apply,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(combinator,type,
    combinator: $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),Z) = apply(X,apply(Y,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( apply(apply(w1,X),Y) = apply(apply(Y,X),X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_33,axiom,
    ! [Y] : ( Y != apply(combinator,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_2,Z_3] : ( apply(apply(apply(b,X_1),Y_2),Z_3) = apply(X_1,apply(Y_2,Z_3)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_90,plain,
    ! [X_11,Y_12,Z_13] : ( apply(apply(apply(b,X_11),Y_12),Z_13) = apply(X_11,apply(Y_12,Z_13)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X_4,Y_5] : ( apply(apply(w1,X_4),Y_5) = apply(apply(Y_5,X_4),X_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_941,plain,
    ! [Z_26,X_27,Y_28] : ( apply(apply(w1,Z_26),apply(apply(b,X_27),Y_28)) = apply(apply(X_27,apply(Y_28,Z_26)),Z_26) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_90,c_4]) ).

tff(c_3502,plain,
    ! [Z_46,X_47,Y_48] : ( apply(apply(w1,Z_46),apply(apply(b,apply(b,X_47)),Y_48)) = apply(X_47,apply(apply(Y_48,Z_46),Z_46)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_941]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [Y_6] : ( apply(combinator,Y_6) != Y_6 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).

tff(c_3830,plain,
    ! [Z_46,Y_48] : ( apply(apply(w1,Z_46),apply(apply(b,apply(b,combinator)),Y_48)) != apply(apply(Y_48,Z_46),Z_46) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3502,c_6]) ).

tff(c_4213,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reflexivity,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3830]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : COL026-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:17:06 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.30/2.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.30/2.72  
% 6.30/2.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.30/2.74  
% 6.30/2.74  Inference rules
% 6.30/2.74  ----------------------
% 6.30/2.74  #Ref     : 1
% 6.30/2.74  #Sup     : 1045
% 6.30/2.74  #Fact    : 0
% 6.30/2.74  #Define  : 0
% 6.30/2.74  #Split   : 0
% 6.30/2.74  #Chain   : 0
% 6.30/2.74  #Close   : 0
% 6.30/2.74  
% 6.30/2.74  Ordering : KBO
% 6.30/2.74  
% 6.30/2.74  Simplification rules
% 6.30/2.74  ----------------------
% 6.30/2.74  #Subsume      : 59
% 6.30/2.74  #Demod        : 559
% 6.30/2.74  #Tautology    : 161
% 6.30/2.74  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 6.30/2.74  #BackRed      : 0
% 6.30/2.74  
% 6.30/2.74  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.30/2.74  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.30/2.74  
% 6.30/2.74  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.30/2.74  ----------------------
% 7.02/2.75  Preprocessing        : 0.38
% 7.02/2.75  Parsing              : 0.20
% 7.02/2.75  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 7.02/2.75  Main loop            : 1.34
% 7.02/2.75  Inferencing          : 0.43
% 7.02/2.75  Reduction            : 0.64
% 7.02/2.75  Demodulation         : 0.57
% 7.02/2.75  BG Simplification    : 0.06
% 7.02/2.75  Subsumption          : 0.15
% 7.02/2.75  Abstraction          : 0.07
% 7.02/2.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.02/2.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.02/2.75  Total                : 1.77
% 7.02/2.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.02/2.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.02/2.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.02/2.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------