TSTP Solution File: COL023-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : COL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 00:42:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : COL023-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May 31 15:27:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Tue May 31 15:27:30 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11946.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.12/0.35  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [copy,6,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,7,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(n,A),B),C)=apply(apply(apply(A,C),B),C).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 16
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 60
% 0.12/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.12/0.37     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.12/0.37     distinct function count: 1
% 0.12/0.37     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.02 sec ----> 222 [binary,221.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  1 [] {-} A!=apply(combinator,A).
% 0.19/0.39  2 [copy,1,flip.1] {+} apply(combinator,A)!=A.
% 0.19/0.39  3 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C)=apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 0.19/0.39  5 [] {-} apply(apply(apply(n,A),B),C)=apply(apply(apply(A,C),B),C).
% 0.19/0.39  7 [copy,5,flip.1] {-} apply(apply(apply(A,B),C),B)=apply(apply(apply(n,A),C),B).
% 0.19/0.39  15 [para_into,7.1.1.1,3.1.1] {-} apply(apply(A,apply(B,C)),B)=apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,A)),C),B).
% 0.19/0.39  221 [para_into,15.1.1,3.1.1] {-} apply(A,apply(apply(B,C),B))=apply(apply(apply(n,apply(b,apply(b,A))),C),B).
% 0.19/0.39  222 [binary,221.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.39  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  true clauses given           2      (15.4%)
% 0.19/0.39  false clauses given         11
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.39    17  5         0
% 0.19/0.39    19  15        1
% 0.19/0.39    21  24        2
% 0.19/0.39    23  24        1
% 0.19/0.39    25  4         0
% 0.19/0.39    27  18        0
% 0.19/0.39    29  12        0
% 0.19/0.39    31  16        0
% 0.19/0.39    33  1         0
% 0.19/0.39    35  8         0
% 0.19/0.39    37  1         0
% 0.19/0.39    39  5         0
% 0.19/0.39  tot:  133       4      (2.9% true)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Process 11946 finished Tue May 31 15:27:30 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------