TSTP Solution File: COL014-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : COL014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:31:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : COL014-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:19:50 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.36  Axiom 1 (l_definition): apply(apply(l, X), Y) = apply(X, apply(Y, Y)).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  Goal 1 (prove_fixed_point): X = apply(combinator, X).
% 0.12/0.36  The goal is true when:
% 0.12/0.36    X = apply(apply(l, combinator), apply(l, combinator))
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  Proof:
% 0.12/0.36    apply(apply(l, combinator), apply(l, combinator))
% 0.12/0.36  = { by axiom 1 (l_definition) }
% 0.12/0.36    apply(combinator, apply(apply(l, combinator), apply(l, combinator)))
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------