TSTP Solution File: COL003-15 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : COL003-15 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:31:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output : Proof 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : COL003-15 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 04:02:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.42 Command-line arguments: --flatten
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.42 Axiom 1 (w_definition): apply(apply(w, X), Y) = apply(apply(X, Y), Y).
% 0.20/0.42 Axiom 2 (b_definition): apply(apply(apply(b, X), Y), Z) = apply(X, apply(Y, Z)).
% 0.20/0.42 Axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point): strong_fixed_point = apply(apply(b, apply(apply(b, apply(w, w)), w)), apply(apply(b, b), b)).
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 Lemma 4: apply(apply(w, w), X) = apply(apply(X, X), X).
% 0.20/0.42 Proof:
% 0.20/0.42 apply(apply(w, w), X)
% 0.20/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (w_definition) }
% 0.20/0.42 apply(apply(w, X), X)
% 0.20/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (w_definition) }
% 0.20/0.42 apply(apply(X, X), X)
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.43 Goal 1 (prove_strong_fixed_point): apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt) = apply(fixed_pt, apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt)).
% 0.20/0.43 Proof:
% 0.20/0.43 apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt)
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(b, apply(apply(b, apply(w, w)), w)), apply(apply(b, b), b)), fixed_pt)
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(b, apply(w, w)), w), apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(w, w), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by lemma 4 }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(w, apply(b, apply(b, fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 1 (w_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(apply(b, apply(b, fixed_pt)), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(apply(apply(b, fixed_pt), apply(apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by lemma 4 R->L }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(w, w), apply(w, apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt))))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) R->L }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(b, apply(w, w)), w), apply(apply(apply(b, b), b), fixed_pt)))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 2 (b_definition) R->L }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(fixed_pt, apply(apply(apply(b, apply(apply(b, apply(w, w)), w)), apply(apply(b, b), b)), fixed_pt))
% 0.20/0.43 = { by axiom 3 (strong_fixed_point) R->L }
% 0.20/0.43 apply(fixed_pt, apply(strong_fixed_point, fixed_pt))
% 0.20/0.43 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------