TSTP Solution File: COL003-1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : COL003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 18:21:59 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.99s 1.08s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 15 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 2 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
b: $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
w: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
f: $i > $i ).
cnf(w_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_definition) ).
cnf(b_definition,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_definition) ).
cnf(prove_strong_fixed_point,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_strong_fixed_point) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
apply(apply(w,X1),X2) = apply(apply(X1,X2),X2),
w_definition ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
apply(apply(apply(b,X1),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X3)),
b_definition ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
apply(X1,f(X1)) != apply(f(X1),apply(X1,f(X1))),
prove_strong_fixed_point ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(b,X1)),X2) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)),apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,f(apply(apply(b,X1),X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
apply(apply(apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))),X2),X3) = apply(X1,apply(apply(X2,X2),X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
apply(apply(w,w),X1) = apply(apply(X1,X1),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3))),apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3))))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),X3)))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
apply(apply(w,apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),X2) = apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
apply(f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(b,X3),X4)))),apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,apply(X4,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(b,X3),X4))))))))) != apply(X1,apply(X2,apply(X3,apply(X4,f(apply(apply(b,X1),apply(apply(b,X2),apply(apply(b,X3),X4)))))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
apply(X1,apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1))))) = apply(apply(w,w),apply(w,apply(b,apply(b,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : COL003-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 05:18:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.59 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.99/1.08 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.99/1.08 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.08 % Proof found
% 0.99/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.99/1.08 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.99/1.08 % Total time : 0.481000 s
% 0.99/1.08 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.99/1.08 % Total time : 0.484000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------