TSTP Solution File: COL002-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : COL002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:47:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 11.57s 11.83s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : COL002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 02:22:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.57/11.83  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 11.57/11.83  The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 11.57/11.83  Wed Jul 27 02:22:05 2022
% 11.57/11.83  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 16857.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 11.57/11.83  set(auto).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(auto1).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(process_input).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 11.57/11.83  clear(print_given).
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  list(usable).
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] A=A.
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] apply(apply(apply(s,X),Y),Z)=apply(apply(X,Z),apply(Y,Z)).
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] apply(apply(apply(b,X),Y),Z)=apply(X,apply(Y,Z)).
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] apply(apply(apply(c,X),Y),Z)=apply(apply(X,Z),Y).
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] apply(i,X)=X.
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] Weak_sage!=apply(fixed_pt,Weak_sage)|fixed_point(Weak_sage).
% 11.57/11.83  0 [] -fixed_point(apply(apply(apply(s,apply(b,X)),i),apply(apply(s,apply(b,X)),i))).
% 11.57/11.83  end_of_list.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 11.57/11.83  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 11.57/11.83  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(para_from).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(para_into).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 11.57/11.83     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  ------------> process usable:
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 2 [copy,1,flip.1] apply(fixed_pt,A)!=A|fixed_point(A).
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 3 [] -fixed_point(apply(apply(apply(s,apply(b,A)),i),apply(apply(s,apply(b,A)),i))).
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  ------------> process sos:
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] A=A.
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 5 [] apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 6 [] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C)=apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 11.57/11.83  ---> New Demodulator: 7 [new_demod,6] apply(apply(apply(b,A),B),C)=apply(A,apply(B,C)).
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 8 [] apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 9 [] apply(i,A)=A.
% 11.57/11.83  ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] apply(i,A)=A.
% 11.57/11.83    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] A=A.
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 11 [copy,5,flip.1] apply(apply(A,B),apply(C,B))=apply(apply(apply(s,A),C),B).
% 11.57/11.83  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 7.
% 11.57/11.83  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 12 [copy,8,flip.1] apply(apply(A,B),C)=apply(apply(apply(c,A),C),B).
% 11.57/11.83  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 11.57/11.83    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] apply(apply(apply(s,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),apply(B,C)).
% 11.57/11.83    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] apply(apply(apply(c,A),B),C)=apply(apply(A,C),B).
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  ======= end of input processing =======
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  =========== start of search ===========
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  sos_size=1017
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  ============ end of search ============
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  -------------- statistics -------------
% 11.57/11.83  clauses given               1409
% 11.57/11.83  clauses generated        1689067
% 11.57/11.83  clauses kept                1790
% 11.57/11.83  clauses forward subsumed   53693
% 11.57/11.83  clauses back subsumed         18
% 11.57/11.83  Kbytes malloced             7812
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 11.57/11.83  user CPU time          9.86          (0 hr, 0 min, 9 sec)
% 11.57/11.83  system CPU time        0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 11.57/11.83  wall-clock time       12             (0 hr, 0 min, 12 sec)
% 11.57/11.83  
% 11.57/11.83  Process 16857 finished Wed Jul 27 02:22:17 2022
% 11.57/11.83  Otter interrupted
% 11.57/11.83  PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------